Giro d'Italia 2021 Giro d'Italia, Stage 2: Stupinigi - Novara 179km

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Which sprinter will start off his Giro the best?

  • Caleb Ewan

    Votes: 35 43.8%
  • Tim Merlier

    Votes: 19 23.8%
  • Dylan Groenewegen

    Votes: 10 12.5%
  • Peter Sagan

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Elia Viviani

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Fernando Gaviria

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Giacomo Nizzolo

    Votes: 6 7.5%
  • David Dekker

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Matteo Moschetti

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 2 2.5%

  • Total voters
    80
  • Poll closed .
Mar 20, 2010
13,132
3,335
28,180
Sky started that trend and it won't stop until we get a big crash because of it that takes out multiple top gc contenders...

Until recently there was no 1K or 3K rules. You got the time you finished with. GC contenders have always ridden in, in order not to lose seconds to other GC contenders. Sky didn't exist for decades yet.
 
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
Until recently there was no 1K or 3K rules. You got the time you finished with. GC contenders have always ridden in, in order not to lose seconds to other GC contenders. Sky didn't exist for decades yet.

The 1K rule was in effect in 2003. We might not like it, but that wasn't exactly recent...
 
Jul 16, 2011
3,251
812
15,680
When the shortest way to the finish line is at the right side of the road, there will always be sprinters launching their sprint to the rightmost part of the road. Some will go for the middle, but no one will go for the very leftmost part of the road.

Absolutely. Soft pedalling into the inside line is stupid.
 
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
LOL I've been following cycling for 60+ years. 2003 is very recent.

I wouldn't say so, considering that the vast majority of current pros have had their entire careers since then.
Some were even toddlers in 2003.
 
Jul 20, 2019
3,200
2,764
14,180
The 1K rule was in effect in 2003. We might not like it, but that wasn't exactly recent...

Think the 1km to go rule dates back to the Merckx era

However, with transponders, why not take the actual time as the riders cross the line? If a rider loses a few seconds in a sprint, tell him to improve his sprinting so he won't lose time in the future
 
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
Think the 1km to go rule dates back to the Merckx era

However, with transponders, why not take the actual time as the riders cross the line? If a rider loses a few seconds in a sprint, tell him to improve his sprinting so he won't lose time in the future

That's exactly what they're trying to avoid; GC guys mixing it with the sprinters.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,124
29,750
28,180
Think the 1km to go rule dates back to the Merckx era

However, with transponders, why not take the actual time as the riders cross the line? If a rider loses a few seconds in a sprint, tell him to improve his sprinting so he won't lose time in the future
For fictive races, I've considered using that on stages where the 3 km rule is not in effect. That is, on uphill finishes.
 
Jul 20, 2019
3,200
2,764
14,180
That's exactly what they're trying to avoid; GC guys mixing it with the sprinters.

I suspect things would go back to the way they were pre 3km rule. You wouldn't see these 3 minute flat out sprint trains like we do now. Instead, sprints would be shorter (probably 30-60 seconds). Thus, safer.

Before we went to 3km to go, the only time I remember there was even speculation of an extended sprint train was if the final day of the 2003 tour came down to bonus seconds. Then Bianchi and USPS would lead things out from more than 1km. Normal sprint lead outs then started inside of 1km to go. Simply less time in the red, which led to far fewer crashes
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
I suspect things would go back to the way they were pre 3km rule. You wouldn't see these 3 minute flat out sprint trains like we do now. Instead, sprints would be shorter (probably 30-60 seconds). Thus, safer.

Before we went to 3km to go, the only time I remember there was even speculation of an extended sprint train was if the final day of the 2003 tour came down to bonus seconds. Then Bianchi and USPS would lead things out from more than 1km. Normal sprint lead outs then started inside of 1km to go. Simply less time in the red, which led to far fewer crashes

These days sprints without a big train stretching things out tend to be much more chaotic

.I don’t think that the development of the train as a tactic has anything much to do with the 3km rule either. Sprinter teams don’t care about time most of the time, so rules about timings have little relevance to them. A train is just a way to make sure your sprinter is in optimum position when he opens up,
.
 
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
"It is not clear if Nizzolo’s helmet design is motivated by protest, a jest in poor taste, or as a gesture of solidarity and support."

WTF?

One of the comments on the link on FB suggested that it might have been a joke aimed at the Italian goverment, with how complicated it was to constantly have the right form.
 
Sep 2, 2011
17,533
13,756
28,180
I don't think there's anything political behind it. Just a creative way to state what he's here for. And we know a Giro stage win matters to him a little more than to most other riders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lui98
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
I don't think there's anything political behind it. Just a creative way to state what he's here for. And we know a Giro stage win matters to him a little more than to most other riders.

That brings me to a question; what happens if he doesn't win a stage? Then he hasn't completely fulfilled his part of the deal.

(I think most people know what he's here for. Same for the rest of the peloton.)
 
Sep 21, 2020
550
379
4,280
Not by choice. It was just unfortunate that Gaviria came that way because he was out of position earlier.
No, 100 % the responsability of Richez. Ending the lead-out, he had to go straight on a line to the finish. Not turn to the right. In most cases, the lead-out deliberately hinders an opponent, now his own teammate :p
 
May 5, 2010
51,684
30,229
28,180
No, 100 % the responsability of Richez. Ending the lead-out, he had to go straight on a line to the finish. Not turn to the right. In most cases, the lead-out deliberately hinders an opponent, now his own teammate :p

Blaming Richeze is a bit mean, though. It was Molano.