• We hope all of you have a great holiday season and wonderful Christmas. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community in 2025 and beyond!

2023-25 Emerging Riders CQ game

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 20, 2017
12,483
23,574
28,180
Losing a tiebreaker for second in a three-year game where scores run past 20000 points... I cannot wrap my head around that one. At least it wasn't for first place, I guess.

It hurts even more because Baudin had 16 points removed for his tramadol offense way back in the first year.
 
Last edited:
Dec 12, 2010
1,198
972
12,680
Losing a tiebreaker for second in a three-year game where scores run past 20000 points... I cannot wrap my head around that one. At least it wasn't for first place, I guess.

It hurts even more because Baudin had 16 points removed for his tramadol offense way back in the first year.
You never know. You might have a guy start the Vuelta a Costa Rica or something.
 
Sep 2, 2011
17,550
13,789
28,180
Time to start your list for the next three years. Let's try not to give the Collective Ignorance 2026-28 the sort of resounding victory it had here.
Quick look at eligible riders for next year tells me it's going to be the hardest edition ever, at least for me.
I'm expecting high variance in team selections, with Collective Ignorance being in prime position to win again.
 
Sep 20, 2017
12,483
23,574
28,180
Quick look at eligible riders for next year tells me it's going to be the hardest edition ever, at least for me.
I'm expecting high variance in team selections, with Collective Ignorance being in prime position to win again.
This was also my first thought. The 2006 generation is so good that its leading lights are already ineligible and the 2007 generation is the weakest set of junior graduates in ages. Consequently there is less than half a team's worth of eligible riders I actually want.
 
Dec 28, 2010
4,174
3,172
21,180
This was also my first thought. The 2006 generation is so good that its leading lights are already ineligible and the 2007 generation is the weakest set of junior graduates in ages. Consequently there is less than half a team's worth of eligible riders I actually want.
These games were kinda more fun when it wasn't mostly about second or first-year U23s. And now even they have priced themselves out, so I guess we have come full circle and it's fun again. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: SafeBet
Jan 31, 2017
173
39
8,880
This was also my first thought. The 2006 generation is so good that its leading lights are already ineligible and the 2007 generation is the weakest set of junior graduates in ages. Consequently there is less than half a team's worth of eligible riders I actually want.

After the fail with Brenner I've never really considered again to select a junior, but seeing how well guys like Seixas are doing and considering how good some prospects from 2008 gen are looking...
 
Oct 2, 2020
2
2
3,515
Losing a tiebreaker for second in a three-year game where scores run past 20000 points... I cannot wrap my head around that one. At least it wasn't for first place, I guess.

It hurts even more because Baudin had 16 points removed for his tramadol offense way back in the first year.
It could be said about any of the results, but I will remember that it was Dinham's 5 points for 32nd place in GC in China that gave me the second place.
 
@Armchair Cyclist the last update here is the final update then? No las month changes and 2nd & 3rd end with photo finish?
There will (I assume) be a 31 Dec update, and any adjustments to scores in that will be taken into account, so that will be the final confirmation.

But as I type that, I suppose I should check that riders' 2024 and 2023 points are indeed as I have them recorded. There may have been results adjusted since the respective end of year downloads.

But hopefully I will be able to declare everything confirmed tomorrow.
 
The 31 December update is out, and our teams added precisely nothing to their points in those few months.
I have also reviewed past scores:
Riccitello had picked up an extra 6 points after MA Lopez was disqualified from the 2023 Vuelta a San Juan for Amis Velo, Bminchow and Nyssinator;
Vladimir was still getting 70 points for Johan Price-Pejtersen in the farcical Danish 2024 ITT championship, so those have been deducted;
I hadn't picked up on MARTINEZ Juan Guillermo being given a second surname by CQ, and similarly the tilde on GOYO PIÑA Jesus Miguel had passed me by, so that's 190 points and 1 point respectively, both for Jakob 747;
Isaac Del Toro rubs in the fact that we all overlooked him by giving the Collective Wisdom team an even greater margin with 30 + 15 points from his Mexican national championship double.

So the final and definitive table is:
1​
Cordi20925
2​
Nakazar20399
3​
DevilsElbow20399
4​
SafeBet20248
5​
Berflamand19964
6​
JPettersen19938
7​
ZipiZapismo19708
8​
Squire19666
9​
EvansIsTheBest19573
10​
Laarsland19514
11​
Skidmark19378
12​
Nyssinator19240
13​
Otoxiep8719193
14​
Fivezzz19117
15​
LukasCPH19029
16​
Madrazo18976
17​
Leadbelly18876
18​
DJW18810
19​
Anderis18712
20​
Joelsim18452
21​
RoteLaterne18439
22​
Rufs18348
23​
Armchair_Cyclist18337
24​
Salvarani17876
25​
JonEzeitza17739
26​
JumboVismaFan17685
27​
Alvarakas17381
28​
Ricco17130
29​
Comodoro17038
30​
Vladimir16985
31​
Bminchow16696
32​
Kryvoskyn16389
33​
Ludwigzgz15777
34​
Hfgon115601
35​
AmisVelo15368
36​
Kazistuta15349
37​
Ray1015033
38​
Blues_in_the_Bottle14448
39​
Greenedge14397
40​
DJSprtsch12927
41​
Jakob74712633
42​
Josedin11527
43​
RedheadDane7471
CollectiveWisdom19466
CollectiveIgnorance26590
MainGame202318513
Goodin202214693

The interForum challenge ended up VeloRooms 18329; CyclingNews 17247; Parlamento Ciclista 16566.

Spreadsheet

And the end of one cycle means the beginning of the next: The 2026-28 edition closes on 19th January (for most of us).
 

Latest posts