- Sep 26, 2020
- 25,331
- 27,827
- 23,180
You are not fooling us, GingerNorwegian. Or are you the StrawberryBlondeSwede?
Well she has apparently spend a lot of time at a Swedish airfield, so I assume the latter is correct.
You are not fooling us, GingerNorwegian. Or are you the StrawberryBlondeSwede?
Well she has apparently spend a lot of time at a Swedish airfield, so I assume the latter is correct.
I didn't spend "A lot of time" at a Swedish airfield. It was maybe a week each summer for a few years.
Think you hit Bulls Eye there.Jesper Worre will probably claim it's because he's no longer race director.
Unless your name is Pedersen, you're officially Swedish now.
So up over Ibækvej/Golfbakken in 2nd position in the peleton in an again hesitating peleton. Doing even Vejle flat as it was a Cph criterium. Typical this race.At a Gran Fondo I participated through 2014-16 Ibækvej/Golfbakken was taken as a nice twisty downhill. On beforehand the weekend before I climbed it several times (using more famous Munkebjergvej downhill) - and to me for a pro peleton, even not a 92kg guy will have serious issues by a single passage - or i.e. maybe he'll be bridged by some 100 - max 200 meters, but surroundings right after are mostly flat, and his force comes him good here, plenty of possibilities catching up.
Having climed Østengaard and Ibækvej several times, Østengaard is one level up compared to Ibækvej/Golfbakken IMO.I remember the peloton getting broken into small groups on the Østengaard hill in the edition that Evenepoel won. That was about 50 km to go. However, Østengaard is shorter but definitely steeper.
It's up to Trek to make the race as hard as possible. The time trial is too flat for them to feel save.
Østengaard is more in the league of Munkebjerg, if not harder. And there is less space on the road.Having climed Østengaard and Ibækvej several times, Østengaard is one level up compared to Ibækvej/Golfbakken IMO.
Same pecking order here. Though the opposite climb Sandagervej (via downhill Højen Skovvej) really caught me severely as a surprise by my first participation in Grejsdalsløbet quarter a century ago. This with 120k's of constantly pushing and attacks in the legs until then from a group not willing to cooperate, but willing to do leg braces all over, both at severe climbs and flat road head wind. By then Sandagervej was my Angliru, on top of the Danish HC+ cats.Østengaard is more in the league of Munkebjerg, if not harder. And there is less space on the road.
I'd put Højen Skovvej over Ibækvej/Golfbakken too. Gradients is more of a factor than length, especially in modern cycling.
Pure race logics would say 'no', unfortunately.Waerenskjold not taking turns. Understandable, but would love it if he did.
You are right about that. Sandagervej definitely a hidden gem.Same pecking order here. Though the opposite climb Sandagervej (via downhill Højen Skovvej) really caught me severely as a surprise by my first participation in Grejsdalsløbet quarter a century ago. This with 120k's of constantly pushing and attacks in the legs until then from a group not willing to cooperate, but willing to do leg braces all over, both at severe climbs and flat road head wind. By then Sandagervej was my Angliru, on top of the Danish HC+ cats.
But now you're mentioning another hill, not original apart of the discussion. I could go severely off-topic if I should give a more serious feedback here, being a hill hunter since early 80ies![]()
Speaking. So close, but no cigar this time.Though the opposite climb Sandagervej (via downhill Højen Skovvej) really caught me severely as a surprise (...)
Wærenskjold looks very strong, and it's also a good sign for him that Charmig also seems to be one of the 10 strongest riders here.
I was hoping for Niklas Larsen to also be very strong here, but it seems like he doesn't have it.