• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2024-25 Cyclocross Game

OK, let's try this again, but a little differently from last time.
What you need to know is shown normally, there are some explainers behind the spoiler fog.



The game, both for budget and scoring, is based on PCS (in the absence of CQ covering cyclocross)

Your team is to consist of 18 riders, with whatever combination of men and women you prefer.

The closing date for the game is 12th October, 16:15 CET (This is chosen as the date of the first race in the Exact cross series: It's only a C2, but that seems to be the race that might see the first appearance of most of the bigger names. Besides, we've got to start somewhere)I have put the closing time back a bit, the Exact Cross doesn't start till relatively late.


Only points scored at elite level will be counted If you have U23 riders, be aware that for men it might be that many of their races will not yield game points, for female riders they may be in championship and occasional other events that don't count
Scoring is since 1st July 2024, will finish on 23rd February 2025 The final race currently shown on PCS, and, I believe, the normal last event of the season in the Sluitingsprijs. The original draft of the rules only included points after entries had closed, but I have been persuaded to allow early season points to be included.

Your budget is 25000 points Last year we were allowed 6 of the top 6 men+ top 6 women, similarly for those ranked 7-12, and 6 others. I used median values (13th to 24th for the third category), and got a score of c28,800, but in the interests of round numbers and making it a bit more competitive, lowered it somewhat, while still allowing selection of several high scorers, as name recognition drops of quickly, for me at least, outside the top 30 or so.

Rider prices are the PCS points for elite level scored in 2023/24: Men's and Women's tables under the bold type, BUT for men who competed in U23 races last year, these values may be overstated. If he was in the top 100, I have calculated his cost without U23 points in the selection spreadsheet: otherwise there is a tool on the second tab in that spreadsheet to help you For women, the U23 scores are already removed from the totals.No, I don't know why they are so inconsistent either

One slight error in those tables, unlikely to affect most selections : because Baroni in 19th is posted twice, the rider in 100th in the women's rankings is not shown. It is Nicole Pesse, 178 pts
I am also aware of one rider, there may be others, that have not appeared in those lists.The best I can suggest is that if a rider is in your mind and you can't see them in the list, go directly to their rider page.

There is be a Selection Spreadsheet tool on Google Docs, which has the top 100 men and women and their prices in it, you can of course shoose riders who are lower in last years rankings For reasons explained above, it was quite laborious to get scores for U23 men, that's why I have not included all the several hundred riders with

We only had 7 players last year: hoping for a much better turnout this time. If anything is unclear, ask away.
Good luck and enjoy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RedheadDane
I still don't like that certain riders, let's call some of them Momas Thein, Scott Tons of Fun, Anna are you okay?, Xan Christen and the wife of Hat Kaannes, who scores most/a lot of their points before the game begins, will be horrible picks.
I understand that (even if I struggle to identify some of your cryptic riders), but I don't think people would have engaged with the game much if I had put out the OP in August.
At least now we have had the advantage of Sylvain Dillier's Zurich bike changes to put us in mind of CX

BUT That rule doesn't have to be locked in (I have a rider in the team I have already selected who would lose a bunch of points under that rule, and it would be one less step in the calculations) I'll mark it in the OP as up for discussion, and will make a final decision on Sunday night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samu Cuenca
Sep 17, 2024
1
0
10
Visit site
Hey, about the points before October 12, I think it's a good idea to exclude them for fairness, Some riders already raced in the U.S and collected points, so they'd have an advantage, Regarding the team composition, balancing men and women is key, but don't overlook lower-ranked riders—they often score well later in the season.Second thing—last season, I forgot a few times that U23 points don't count in every event, so it's worth checking that closely before picking riders. :)
 
I'm not sure who Noah is: not one of the competitors in last years game unless we have a change of user-name, but in that case why are they bothered about points they overlooked last year. No offence intended, but bottery?

Yes, some riders already have points, but the option to pick them is open to everyone: it is to maximise breadth of selections, not because there is any advantage to be gained, that I proposed not including points already on the board. I hope others will chime in with opinions before the weekend is out.
 
Which could have been solved if someone had just announced the game a little earlier...
I looked at the calendar some time ago, and thought that the main series events, being the ones most likely to be broadcast, would be the one to take as a start point. Although Exact Cross isn't a season long competition, those races usually get more attention as C2s than C1s that do not have outsized ducks in attendance.
 
I looked at the calendar some time ago, and thought that the main series events, being the ones most likely to be broadcast, would be the one to take as a start point.

Still doesn't exaplain why you only gave us ten days...

And just to be clear; It's X2O with the outsized ducks:

Screen+Shot+2021-09-24+at+9.23.28+pm.png


Did I deliberately pick that photo because it looks like the duck is sneaking up on the guy?
Yes, yes I did!