two interesting post-race interviews on rtbf:
Bernard hinault: "they [the brothers] could not attack. He was much too strong. They did try on st nicolas but the counter was even more violent." (or something like that).
Fränk schleck: "we wanted to make the race and be loyal. We've seen in flanders and roubaix that many riders wanted to make fabian [cancellara] lose and we didn't want that. We wanted to win liège but not to make another lose."
that's my conclusion. The schleck's may be proud of how they raced. And i'm not a particular fan. Had they raced like hushovd and chavanel/qs, we would have been entitled to criticize them but not the way they raced today.
I hope that those who criticize them, approved hushovd's shameless tactics on the way to roubaix.
In a way, it reminds me of gimondi in mendrisio 1971. He was also criticized for co-operating with merckx who was faster than him. His response was: "why shouldn't i? In order to make guimard win who didn't pull a single time? Nah, eddy made his jersey wet and deserved to win."
case closed.