OK, I was thinking of doping during a concert this evening, particularly how effective is doping and how can detection methods be improved? One of the problems with this is that professional athletes cannot partake in this research for obvious reasons, but this is the group that would most benefit from this research. That then got me thinking ... why not do a cross-over study with recently banned professional cyclists? They are already banned, so it is not unethical for them to use certain doping products. If they participated in the study, then maybe the UCI could knock off some time of their suspension. I am no physiologist or trainer, but you could do something like:
- Training block with no products
- Training block with full dose EPO
- Training block with microdose EPO and blood transfusions
- Training block with blood transfusions
- Training block with testosterone
I am not sure what you would measure, but VO2 max, power output, etc. More importantly, the doping experts could then collect urine and blood at various time points to see when and how the best methods of detection are for each protocol. Because drug cheats are the guinea pigs, they would also know the most current protocols and doses, such as detailed by Kohl and Landis.
It might be a wacky idea, but something to think of anyway?
- Training block with no products
- Training block with full dose EPO
- Training block with microdose EPO and blood transfusions
- Training block with blood transfusions
- Training block with testosterone
I am not sure what you would measure, but VO2 max, power output, etc. More importantly, the doping experts could then collect urine and blood at various time points to see when and how the best methods of detection are for each protocol. Because drug cheats are the guinea pigs, they would also know the most current protocols and doses, such as detailed by Kohl and Landis.
It might be a wacky idea, but something to think of anyway?