• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

a significant math mistake

Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
gregod said:
Does this really need to be explained?

Well you can say "300% more" and the author probably tried to use similar phrasing in this situation but obviously that is incorrect.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
gregod said:
Does this really need to be explained?

Well its fairly obvious, if a rival has 10m a year, then 300% of that is 30m, so they have negative 20m a year :D
 
gregod said:
Does this really need to be explained?

Quote:
Despite a budget of between 50 per cent and 300 per cent less than their rivals, Bretagne-Schuller is confident of its wild card chances.

Does this really need to be explained?
----------
50 per cent and 300 per cent = multiplication

less than = subtraction

From reading newspapers over half a century, be it in English or in French, I have concluded that a majority of journalists do not have a command of the language of mathematics as you beautifully exemplified in this particular case.
 
Mar 16, 2009
19,482
2
0
usedtobefast said:
but that was eggs. this is egg. and i am not the eggman.;)
Are you the Walrus? coo coo ca choo
The answer lays in either:
Fudd's First Law of Opposition
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
Or
Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law
It goes in -- it must come out.
 
krebs303 said:
Are you the Walrus? coo coo ca choo
The answer lays in either:
Fudd's First Law of Opposition
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.
Or
Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law
It goes in -- it must come out.

i think you broke the president...
 
Mar 16, 2009
19,482
2
0
usedtobefast said:
i think you broke the president...
well my mother was a bozoette in school:rolleyes:
She always told me "you have to start young if your going to stick it out"
I have to go I'm tired of all theses geeks a gawking at me
 
Le breton said:
Quote:
Despite a budget of between 50 per cent and 300 per cent less than their rivals, Bretagne-Schuller is confident of its wild card chances.

Does this really need to be explained?
----------
50 per cent and 300 per cent = multiplication

less than = subtraction

From reading newspapers over half a century, be it in English or in French, I have concluded that a majority of journalists do not have a command of the language of mathematics as you beautifully exemplified in this particular case.

Actually 50% less would be one half as much, while 100% less would be nothing. Maybe what they are trying to say is that where their competition has a 5 million budget they are actually starting out 10 million in debt?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Hugh Januss said:
Actually 50% less would be one half as much, while 100% less would be nothing. Maybe what they are trying to say is that where their competition has a 5 million budget they are actually starting out 10 million in debt?

that was the conclusion i came to. alternatively cn are talking hogwash.
 
Mar 16, 2009
19,482
2
0
You are seeking truth from statistics?

now let's take $100 increase it 400% now we have $400. lets decrease it $300. Now your money decreased by 75% or 3 sets of 100. 100 being the original 100% you can say your $ went down 300%
Lies, darn lies and satistics
 
krebs303 said:
You are seeking truth from statistics?

now let's take $100 increase it 400% now we have $400. lets decrease it $300. Now your money decreased by 75% or 3 sets of 100. 100 being the original 100% you can say your $ went down 300%
Lies, darn lies and satistics

760px-airstability_svg.png