jens_attacks said:
mostly will disagree with me arguing medical assistance blablabla.i still think it's possible but there's a lot of tactics and a lot of cowards nowadays.so thanks god for rujano,he is the only one capable of some il pirata-like attacks(i have to rewatch soon colle delle finestre 2011).
riders attacking just on the last climb of the day is one of the biggest disappointments in this sport.
That was part of what made that Gardeccia stage so good though - both the breakaway (with the attack of Garzelli, followed by Nieve, then Bakelandts, and the duo Sella/di Luca) and the heads of state (with the attacks of Rodríguez and Arroyo) had split it up as early as the Passo Giau. You then had both Nibali (on the way down Giau) and Arroyo (at the base of Fedaia) attacking long before Contador launched his exploratory expedition.
The problem is that now, other contenders aren't really content to let a rival contender get up the road early on even if they're likely to be pulled back long before it matters (Sastre's doomed attempt to get back into the GC mix on the Pau stage last year excepted, that was brave but everybody knew he had no chance, including him). It's not just that riders are too cowardly to make those attacks (though many undoubtedly are) - it's that there are too many GC contenders who rely on not letting those guys get away until the final climb. Especially with the UCI's points system putting more and more emphasis on placements, which only multiplies the amount of people prepared to sabotage any breaks in order to save 7th place (Garmin chasing the break down in that same Pau stage last year to stop Plaza and Horner threatening Ryder Hesjedal's 10th place was particularly depressing). Which in turn makes it increasingly pointless for the attacking riders to launch off the front three climbs from the end of the day like they're José Manuel Fuente or something - because instead of a handful of guys trying to control them, they'll have a whole group of teams working to sabotage the attack.