Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread

Page 1620 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Amnes2015 said:
Walkman said:
Never been a fan but this is pretty ridiculous. He crashed. Just look at the Dauphine 2014 to se what a crash can do to a rider. Froome went from thermonuclear to a top-10 rider (at the Dauphine) over night.

this x1000

and remember Froome at 2014 TdF he wasn't brilliant in the first 4 stages, very shaky, Dauphine crash messed with his form the next 3 weeks

like wise Contador crashing in TdF killed some of his form and affecting his preparation for Vuelta, crashing again in Vuelta... and still near the podium, that's some good showing imo.


The same can be said about 2014. However, he still managed to win the Vuelta, despite the injury that prevented him from training properly.
Contador isn't near the podium. In fact, he's getting farther and farther from it (when it comes to time loss). Even Valverde, who has a gazillion more race days in his legs, is showing to be better.
 
burning said:
Vino attacks everyone said:
Amnes2015 said:
Walkman said:
Never been a fan but this is pretty ridiculous. He crashed. Just look at the Dauphine 2014 to se what a crash can do to a rider. Froome went from thermonuclear to a top-10 rider (at the Dauphine) over night.

this x1000

and remember Froome at 2014 TdF he wasn't brilliant in the first 4 stages, very shaky, Dauphine crash messed with his form the next 3 weeks

like wise Contador crashing in TdF killed some of his form and affecting his preparation for Vuelta, crashing again in Vuelta... and still near the podium, that's some good showing imo.
Or Vino 07. Going from being the greatest cyclist of any generation to just the worlds greatest tter due to a crash :(

Then he went from the worlds greatest tter to a crappy climber to the worlds best climber. :p
And people think Valverde is versatile
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,169
0
0
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Sciocco said:
It's hard to believe that Contador is going to try and win this GT and the next few GTs he races? Maybe the WCRR is a stretch but it's been repeatedly stated on this forum that it's going to be unbelievably difficult and if he somehow wins, wouldn't he race 2019 in the rainbow jersey?

****, I'd be cool with him just racing some more VPV as that's my favorite short stage race.
Lol of course he'll try but you said he will win :p As for the WC, he'll be almost 36 ;)
Maybe he will, I can only hope there will be more victories. And so long as he keeps racing I get to put off finding a new #1 favorite rider. :cry:
 
Re: Re:

Sciocco said:
LaFlorecita said:
Sciocco said:
It's hard to believe that Contador is going to try and win this GT and the next few GTs he races? Maybe the WCRR is a stretch but it's been repeatedly stated on this forum that it's going to be unbelievably difficult and if he somehow wins, wouldn't he race 2019 in the rainbow jersey?

****, I'd be cool with him just racing some more VPV as that's my favorite short stage race.
Lol of course he'll try but you said he will win :p As for the WC, he'll be almost 36 ;)
Maybe he will, I can only hope there will be more victories. And so long as he keeps racing I get to put off finding a new #1 favorite rider. :cry:
Maybe someday we'll find him back in the polls, when the Vino joke gets old :eek:
 
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
Sciocco said:
LaFlorecita said:
Sciocco said:
It's hard to believe that Contador is going to try and win this GT and the next few GTs he races? Maybe the WCRR is a stretch but it's been repeatedly stated on this forum that it's going to be unbelievably difficult and if he somehow wins, wouldn't he race 2019 in the rainbow jersey?

****, I'd be cool with him just racing some more VPV as that's my favorite short stage race.
Lol of course he'll try but you said he will win :p As for the WC, he'll be almost 36 ;)
Maybe he will, I can only hope there will be more victories. And so long as he keeps racing I get to put off finding a new #1 favorite rider. :cry:
Maybe someday we'll find him back in the polls, when the Vino joke gets old :eek:

:confused:
 
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
Red Rick said:
Sciocco said:
LaFlorecita said:
Sciocco said:
It's hard to believe that Contador is going to try and win this GT and the next few GTs he races? Maybe the WCRR is a stretch but it's been repeatedly stated on this forum that it's going to be unbelievably difficult and if he somehow wins, wouldn't he race 2019 in the rainbow jersey?

****, I'd be cool with him just racing some more VPV as that's my favorite short stage race.
Lol of course he'll try but you said he will win :p As for the WC, he'll be almost 36 ;)
Maybe he will, I can only hope there will be more victories. And so long as he keeps racing I get to put off finding a new #1 favorite rider. :cry:
Maybe someday we'll find him back in the polls, when the Vino joke gets old :eek:

:confused:
Yes, I should watch my tone. Vino is no joke
 
Jul 19, 2010
5,361
0
0
Contador has had a long career already. I'm not surprise if he starts to feel burn out. In the last few GT, he has been crashed and eventually that would take a toll for him mentally. Just put yourself in his shoe. It's already hard just keep himself motivated after all these years... then added the fact that he kept hitting the deck on the most important race that he had been preparing all year long. He doesn't have that many chances, that's probably add a pressure and the burn out.. i guess. Yes, he is strong mentally and he has faced lots of adversity during his career. But age and what crashed do to the aging body are adversity that's out of his control. Lance, Vino, Bruyneel, Oleg etc are adversity that he can handle.

I love Contador. But I'm also realistic. This is the era of Froome/Quintana. Maybe when he said he wanted to retire at the beginning of this year, he might already felt the burn out? He tried Giro/Tour double, for his own personal challenge (he said it himself, that he needed a challenge to motivate him). But he probably has thrown his precious chances to win another TDF. Ow well.. Next year is a new year. Maybe with no GT win this year will help him to keep hungry and motivated for next year. Champion like him needs a challenge to conquer.
 
Mar 31, 2014
166
0
0
Jelantik said:
Contador has had a long career already. I'm not surprise if he starts to feel burn out. In the last few GT, he has been crashed and eventually that would take a toll for him mentally. Just put yourself in his shoe. It's already hard just keep himself motivated after all these years... then added the fact that he kept hitting the deck on the most important race that he had been preparing all year long. He doesn't have that many chances, that's probably add a pressure and the burn out.. i guess. Yes, he is strong mentally and he has faced lots of adversity during his career. But age and what crashed do to the aging body are adversity that's out of his control. Lance, Vino, Bruyneel, Oleg etc are adversity that he can handle.

I love Contador. But I'm also realistic. This is the era of Froome/Quintana. Maybe when he said he wanted to retire at the beginning of this year, he might already felt the burn out? He tried Giro/Tour double, for his own personal challenge (he said it himself, that he needed a challenge to motivate him). But he probably has thrown his precious chances to win another TDF. Ow well.. Next year is a new year. Maybe with no GT win this year will help him to keep hungry and motivated for next year. Champion like him needs a challenge to conquer.

Its not the chrases or mentally that prevent him to win a Tour de France these days. He is missing 30 watts to Froome in every Tour de France since Froome was riding there. Thats all. 2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. But that was a once in a lifetime situation with these circumstances.

Contadors shape and power output are pretty even at every race of the year. He has no better shape at Gts as he has at Paris-Nice or Pays Vasco this year for example. But Froome and Quintana making up 2 more steps between Catalunya, TDR and TDF for example. Thats all.
 
Mar 11, 2013
393
0
0
boasson said:
Jelantik said:
Contador has had a long career already. I'm not surprise if he starts to feel burn out. In the last few GT, he has been crashed and eventually that would take a toll for him mentally. Just put yourself in his shoe. It's already hard just keep himself motivated after all these years... then added the fact that he kept hitting the deck on the most important race that he had been preparing all year long. He doesn't have that many chances, that's probably add a pressure and the burn out.. i guess. Yes, he is strong mentally and he has faced lots of adversity during his career. But age and what crashed do to the aging body are adversity that's out of his control. Lance, Vino, Bruyneel, Oleg etc are adversity that he can handle.

I love Contador. But I'm also realistic. This is the era of Froome/Quintana. Maybe when he said he wanted to retire at the beginning of this year, he might already felt the burn out? He tried Giro/Tour double, for his own personal challenge (he said it himself, that he needed a challenge to motivate him). But he probably has thrown his precious chances to win another TDF. Ow well.. Next year is a new year. Maybe with no GT win this year will help him to keep hungry and motivated for next year. Champion like him needs a challenge to conquer.

Its not the chrases or mentally that prevent him to win a Tour de France these days. He is missing 30 watts to Froome in every Tour de France since Froome was riding there. Thats all. 2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. But that was a once in a lifetime situation with these circumstances.

Contadors shape and power output are pretty even at every race of the year. He has no better shape at Gts as he has at Paris-Nice or Pays Vasco this year for example. But Froome and Quintana making up 2 more steps between Catalunya, TDR and TDF for example. Thats all.

Agreed boasson. This is what it all boils down to. He simply cannot consistently put out the same watts as Froome. And this has been the case for a few years now.
 
LaFlorecita said:
boasson said:
2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. .
And Contador hadn't suffered a crash and an injury, he was at full strength?

I think he still has it, he just don't have the stamina to keep it as long as Froome/Quintana and in certain cases also Valverde.

This was already the case in Dauphine this year, where no crashes were involved and he hasn't improved since.
 
bambino said:
LaFlorecita said:
boasson said:
2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. .
And Contador hadn't suffered a crash and an injury, he was at full strength?

I think he still has it, he just don't have the stamina to keep it as long as Froome/Quintana and in certain cases also Valverde.

This was already the case in Dauphine this year, where no crashes were involved and he hasn't improved since.
My post was in reply to your comment about the 2014 Vuelta. :)
 
LaFlorecita said:
bambino said:
LaFlorecita said:
boasson said:
2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. .
And Contador hadn't suffered a crash and an injury, he was at full strength?

I think he still has it, he just don't have the stamina to keep it as long as Froome/Quintana and in certain cases also Valverde.

This was already the case in Dauphine this year, where no crashes were involved and he hasn't improved since.
My post was in reply to your comment about the 2014 Vuelta. :)

And I replied with a general note about AC, sorry about that...

Was not my comment btw. :)
 
bambino said:
LaFlorecita said:
bambino said:
LaFlorecita said:
boasson said:
2014 at la Vuelta Froome was missing this 30 watts because of his chrashes in Dauphine and TDF, his injurys and his psychological blow. So there were pretty even. .
And Contador hadn't suffered a crash and an injury, he was at full strength?

I think he still has it, he just don't have the stamina to keep it as long as Froome/Quintana and in certain cases also Valverde.

This was already the case in Dauphine this year, where no crashes were involved and he hasn't improved since.
My post was in reply to your comment about the 2014 Vuelta. :)

And I replied with a general note about AC, sorry about that...

Was not my comment btw. :)
Sorry :eek: misread your username. I agree that he still has the level but not the stamina, which is why he still does well in MTTs. It makes me wonder if Tinkoff made a mistake yesterday by pushing the pace.
 
Nah well, don't think so, Tinkoff had to try. The climb wasn't that long, so they probably had calculated he would be able to push the whole 6 km and have a chance to win against bit more tired field. I guess that was a miscalculation for both, his ability to push and the level of the competition
 
About the spring. For the last 10 years the spring has been a good indicator for Contador's shape in the GT's he rides. That's not so much the case for Froome, Quintana or Nibali. Some of his rides in the spring were as good or almost as good as in his best years. The Dauphine is hard to compare to previous years because of better competition, because Froome didn't crash out this time and because frankly blowing up on Vaujani or whatever the climb was is a lot easier than on Col du Beal, which isn't more than 6%. The competition beside Froome in the Dauphine was a lot stronger this year. For the rest of the Dauphine, he basically got better by the day, and he got rid of the Sky Train on the Noyer.

From the Tour you can't draw any conclusions at all, as the crashes had happened before any GC stage were ridden. As for the Vuelta, the assumption that's made is that he left the Tour in the same shape as in 2014, and at a similar moment in the Tour. I'm inclinded to disagree with that. He rode around with an injuries for over a week. He rode around in a Tour peloton when his body needed the energy to recover. You don't hold your shape doing that. So I used more energy in those 9 stages of the Tour than he did in the 10 stages he started in 2014, and came out in worse shape. Then there's a difference in injury, bone vs muscle, and for condition, there's an argument that muscle injuries are worse if they have the same recovery time. How much worse we don't know. Also, coming out the Tour with worse shape en more fatigue, recovery is worse. yada yada yada.

All in all, I don't think this Vuelta is enough to say that Contador is past it. Spring was good, I think the Dauphine was ok, Tour means nothing, and the Vuelta is a rather complicated matter with all that has happend is since landing on a traffic island somewhere in north-western France in early July. Now I am a fan of the guy, and I all hope this is true, but I'm just trying to put the pieces together here.

I'll wait for the spring of 2017 at least before writing him off. If that's good, I'll wait for the GT's of 2017, and even if he fails, I'll be shouting at my television screen when he attacks from 50km out because he can rather than because it's a good choice.
 
Aug 30, 2016
72
0
2,680
This
But….As a die hard fan & someone who has been watching him for years…(hovering over this thread for a long time now as well!), I have to say that he every time he lines up for a race these days, I am nervous: Is he going to crash? Is he going to be dropped? Never felt like that before, so something has changed…and I just love watching this guy race.
 
Mar 31, 2014
166
0
0
Re:

Red Rick said:
About the spring. For the last 10 years the spring has been a good indicator for Contador's shape in the GT's he rides. That's not so much the case for Froome, Quintana or Nibali. Some of his rides in the spring were as good or almost as good as in his best years. The Dauphine is hard to compare to previous years because of better competition, because Froome didn't crash out this time and because frankly blowing up on Vaujani or whatever the climb was is a lot easier than on Col du Beal, which isn't more than 6%. The competition beside Froome in the Dauphine was a lot stronger this year. For the rest of the Dauphine, he basically got better by the day, and he got rid of the Sky Train on the Noyer.

From the Tour you can't draw any conclusions at all, as the crashes had happened before any GC stage were ridden. As for the Vuelta, the assumption that's made is that he left the Tour in the same shape as in 2014, and at a similar moment in the Tour. I'm inclinded to disagree with that. He rode around with an injuries for over a week. He rode around in a Tour peloton when his body needed the energy to recover. You don't hold your shape doing that. So I used more energy in those 9 stages of the Tour than he did in the 10 stages he started in 2014, and came out in worse shape. Then there's a difference in injury, bone vs muscle, and for condition, there's an argument that muscle injuries are worse if they have the same recovery time. How much worse we don't know. Also, coming out the Tour with worse shape en more fatigue, recovery is worse. yada yada yada.

All in all, I don't think this Vuelta is enough to say that Contador is past it. Spring was good, I think the Dauphine was ok, Tour means nothing, and the Vuelta is a rather complicated matter with all that has happend is since landing on a traffic island somewhere in north-western France in early July. Now I am a fan of the guy, and I all hope this is true, but I'm just trying to put the pieces together here.

I'll wait for the spring of 2017 at least before writing him off. If that's good, I'll wait for the GT's of 2017, and even if he fails, I'll be shouting at my television screen when he attacks from 50km out because he can rather than because it's a good choice.

Well, the spring was pretty bad in my opinion. He finished 3rd in Algarve behind Thomas and Ion. Was behind a guy like Pinot in the TT. Was far behind at Alto Foia, outside the top 20. Only Malhao was good. All in all his worst Algarve ever.

After that he rode Paris-Nice. An average Prologue at the beginning. At the one and only MTF he was not able to hold the wheels of Thomas and Zakarin. A great show at the last stage, but not able to drop a guy like Porte and only gained 5 secs to a really bad Thomas at this day.

The next race was Catalunya. At the Queen-stage at Port Aine he was dropped clearly by Quintana and lost the race there.

At Pais Vasco he was not able to drop Henao a week long. Only one amazing TT brought him the win. With 12 seconds to Henao in GC...

After that there is standing a 5th place at Dauphine behind guys like Bardet, Porte and Dan Martin. And a blow off at the first Uphill finish.

Compare this with the spring of 2014 were he won Tirreno with over 2 Minutes!!!! in front of Quintana, won Pais Vasco easily and destroyed all others at the first stage, only lost Catalunya because of the uphill sprints to Purito, finished Dauphine at 2nd place only because he was riding without a team at the last stage. Not mentioned his awesome spring in 2010. So the spring 2016 was pretty average in my opinion.
 
When you look at his age, injuries and long career, it has to take it's toll sooner or later. For many riders it happens before the age Contador is at now. The few percent missing makes all the difference when competing against Froome and Quintana. He won't stop attacking as that is his style but it seems now that he pays for the attacks more if they don't work. Maybe the age is starting to show. Usually by mid thirties the drop off for GC riders can be sudden. Classics riders not so much.
 
Re: Re:

boasson said:
Red Rick said:
About the spring. For the last 10 years the spring has been a good indicator for Contador's shape in the GT's he rides. That's not so much the case for Froome, Quintana or Nibali. Some of his rides in the spring were as good or almost as good as in his best years. The Dauphine is hard to compare to previous years because of better competition, because Froome didn't crash out this time and because frankly blowing up on Vaujani or whatever the climb was is a lot easier than on Col du Beal, which isn't more than 6%. The competition beside Froome in the Dauphine was a lot stronger this year. For the rest of the Dauphine, he basically got better by the day, and he got rid of the Sky Train on the Noyer.

From the Tour you can't draw any conclusions at all, as the crashes had happened before any GC stage were ridden. As for the Vuelta, the assumption that's made is that he left the Tour in the same shape as in 2014, and at a similar moment in the Tour. I'm inclinded to disagree with that. He rode around with an injuries for over a week. He rode around in a Tour peloton when his body needed the energy to recover. You don't hold your shape doing that. So I used more energy in those 9 stages of the Tour than he did in the 10 stages he started in 2014, and came out in worse shape. Then there's a difference in injury, bone vs muscle, and for condition, there's an argument that muscle injuries are worse if they have the same recovery time. How much worse we don't know. Also, coming out the Tour with worse shape en more fatigue, recovery is worse. yada yada yada.

All in all, I don't think this Vuelta is enough to say that Contador is past it. Spring was good, I think the Dauphine was ok, Tour means nothing, and the Vuelta is a rather complicated matter with all that has happend is since landing on a traffic island somewhere in north-western France in early July. Now I am a fan of the guy, and I all hope this is true, but I'm just trying to put the pieces together here.

I'll wait for the spring of 2017 at least before writing him off. If that's good, I'll wait for the GT's of 2017, and even if he fails, I'll be shouting at my television screen when he attacks from 50km out because he can rather than because it's a good choice.

Well, the spring was pretty bad in my opinion. He finished 3rd in Algarve behind Thomas and Ion. Was behind a guy like Pinot in the TT. Was far behind at Alto Foia, outside the top 20. Only Malhao was good. All in all his worst Algarve ever.

After that he rode Paris-Nice. An average Prologue at the beginning. At the one and only MTF he was not able to hold the wheels of Thomas and Zakarin. A great show at the last stage, but not able to drop a guy like Porte and only gained 5 secs to a really bad Thomas at this day.

The next race was Catalunya. At the Queen-stage at Port Aine he was dropped clearly by Quintana and lost the race there.

At Pais Vasco he was not able to drop Henao a week long. Only one amazing TT brought him the win. With 12 seconds to Henao in GC...

After that there is standing a 5th place at Dauphine behind guys like Bardet, Porte and Dan Martin. And a blow off at the first Uphill finish.

Compare this with the spring of 2014 were he won Tirreno with over 2 Minutes!!!! in front of Quintana, won Pais Vasco easily and destroyed all others at the first stage, only lost Catalunya because of the uphill sprints to Purito, finished Dauphine at 2nd place only because he was riding without a team at the last stage. Not mentioned his awesome spring in 2010. So the spring 2016 was pretty average in my opinion.
You're mostly looking at results, now about how and why it happened like it did. To each his own I guess
 
Aug 6, 2015
50
0
0
From what I can see on Twitter there's a lot of in fighting within the team so with all the crashes too I'm sure Bertie has low morale. Looks like Trek have a good few signings for next year if he goes there.
 
Very disappointed by Contador this Vuelta.I know he crashed but still :(
He was decent at Camperona and bad at Pena Cabarga
About Covadonga,it was very weird,he attacks then blows up and even gets passed by Chavez losing more than a minute in less than 4 kms which some of were descent.