The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
BroDeal said:
Le breton said:Access denied.
Too bad, I would like to know what Hampsten has to say.
In particular how he managed so well (compared to LeMond) post 1990
rhubroma said:He never won the Tour probably.
But seriously, he was always someone of culture from what we were told in the press, read a lot, appreciated the sport also at the level of European history. And he has adopted Italy as a second home outside the US, where he conducts a cycling tour business in Tuscany. Lemond, by contrast, seems to have remained trapped within that pioneer spirit and Mid-Western "values" he brought with him to the sport in the early 80's from his native America. He has thus not expanded his horizons after his sporting career, as Hampsten has done.
Not that its bad, just that he seems to have never outgrown that culture and, not having outgrown it, has remained stuck in the past.
Of course, however, I sincerely admire his efforts to expose doping and Armstrong.
Le breton said:Access denied.
Too bad, I would like to know what Hampsten has to say.
In particular how he managed so well (compared to LeMond) post 1990
BroDeal said:
His (Eddy's) theory was: “Don’t select equipment that makes you gain seconds on an uphill and lose minutes on a downhill.” His bikes were a bit heavier. His theory was that if you were a climber or a sprinter, you needed most of all to conserve energy. His point was that if you sacrifice the ride quality, your muscles get jarred for six, seven hours. You are beat up. All anyone cares about is if you have what it takes to breakaway or take a climb at the end of the stage. Even if you go slow for the middle five hours, your muscles are tired later. Now, that theory is certainly also true for us working stiffs who don’t ride everyday. If you go ride for six hours your only complaint should be that you wanted to ride seven, not that your neck hurts.
9000ft said:I was glad to have met Hampsten a couple times back in the day at promotional/charity rides. Really nice, unassuming guy. Seems like he's just a plain happier person than a lot of the highly driven, egocentric, hyper competitive, highly strung guys in the elite bike racing world. (maybe that's just the kind of person one needs to be to make it these days) Always kept bike racing in perspective. Never needed to keep himself in the spotlight and grab headlines during or after his competitive career.
Seemed to be just a very talented guy who loved to ride and race bikes. Of course having met him twice at promotional events doesn't mean I know the guy but that was my impression. Maybe that's why he was never a super star (that's not a dig at Hampsten, Andy's career speaks for itself. By super star I mean somebody who is a household name outside of the bike racing world.)
Hard not to like that Strada Bianca model.icebreaker said:Andy and his brother Steve are partners in a bike building business in Seattle.
Yu should go check out the bikes at their website ( hampsten.com - I think), anyway you will see a lot of really sensible design built into those bikes - they aren't the heaviest, nor are they the lightest, but they are real nice and make a lot of sense.
PS: The Crema is sweet!
Race Radio said:Andy says he saw the same as LeMond when the sport changed and supported him in speaking out
http://www.dailypeloton.com/displayarticle.asp?pk=6730
That was a great read.BroDeal said:Another interview. This time from a Colombian perspective.
http://www.cyclinginquisition.com/2011/04/racing-in-colombia-and-with-colombians.html