Eshnar
Moderator
they will find a way. Like "Astana was already meant to race... hotels booked... big damage... blah blah"LaFlorecita said:RCS might, but UCI won't allow it.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
they will find a way. Like "Astana was already meant to race... hotels booked... big damage... blah blah"LaFlorecita said:RCS might, but UCI won't allow it.
mrhender said:-The UCI submits its written request to the Licence Commission
-A hearing is called with the team given at least 10 days notice
-If the licence is withdrawn the team could stop racing, there's no automatic granting of a second-tier Pro Conti licence
-Astana may appeal the verdict to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
-Any CAS appeal will take time, possibly two months, and there is scope for Astana to make a separate fast-track appeal to win back its licence on a temporary basis in order to keep riding.
burning said:There is no way in hell that this would happen. I think UCI is just doing a PR work, nothing more.
jens_attacks said:if the circ report comes before may, tinkov and probably another 10 teams won't ride the giro anyway i guess. so if some are happy now, they will cry later
astana, clean cycling pride!!!!!!!!!
hrotha said:It's hard not to think why they wouldn't suspend Astana when the possibility was first discussed, instead of waiting until the season started, but oh well. They had it coming either way.
King Boonen said:Wow. If this happens then... I don't know... It's both brilliant and possibly very, very damaging.
coimbrawu said:another question:
Astana is still a WT team? They should be disqualified after Licence Commission's decision? So if Licence Commission make decision after some race, say Paris-Nice, they still can attend PN?
good post sniper.sniper said:...
Astana, Katusha and the likes can be thrown under the bus.
mrhender said:The Lusanne audit may be a template for future license grantings...
Cookson has suggested licensing changes in relation to CIRC report coming up...
If so then we might actually get some positive changes...
We know few details as of now, but so far it is all very interesting...
BeagRigh said:Wow, **** just got interesting.
Can't see the UCI starting this if they're not confident of finishing it, especially after getting egg on their faces at CAS with Katusha.
Is this just an exercise in getting rid of Vino or do we think they have info on Nibali and the Italian "part" of the team?
I'm guessing the former. New Italian Pro-Cont team with Nibali, Aru, Slongo and Martinelli in time for the Giro???
King Boonen said:Completely agree, this could be exactly what we have all been waiting for and a real push towards clean cycling.
However, it could be very damaging to the sport. If teams thought it was hard getting sponsors before then just wait until this blows up. Sponsors can force whatever rules and regs they want on teams, but the idea that your whole investment could go down the pan is not going to sit well with the guys who hold the purse strings...
mrhender said:Okay....
... sniped ...
UCI might have gone tough on doping but are they really ready to dish a dozen of stars and a major team earning them big bucks?
I don't know what the final solutuon will be but i think they will find a way of letting those boys race, however it will be without Vino as he is not a "fit and proper person..."
BeagRigh said:The bolded and King Boonen's posts are key IMO. UCI needs a figurehead for this or they risk losing a lot of teams sponsors and a lot of TV rights money.
I also highly doubt they want the new clean generation narrative disturbed by taking down last years tour winner.
King Boonen said:Completely agree, this could be exactly what we have all been waiting for and a real push towards clean cycling.
However, it could be very damaging to the sport. If teams thought it was hard getting sponsors before then just wait until this blows up. Sponsors can force whatever rules and regs they want on teams, but the idea that your whole investment could go down the pan is not going to sit well with the guys who hold the purse strings...
Dr. Juice said:UCI with a British president promoting "clean cycling" is still furious about an evil doper taking away the gold medal from hard working, marginally gaining British athletes.