chiocciolis_calves said:
It's more popular to pick the 1989 Tour, but the 1987 one came down to the final time trial and it wasn't decided by technology. And, truth be told, Roche's recovery on La Plagne was more exciting than LeMond's TT triumph, having watched both of them at the time.
Have to disagree with you. '87 vs '89. 1987 was the year of Roche. The dude was phenomenal. He was the prohibitive favorite going in. His ride on La Plange was awesome. But we all knew the final time trial was a foregone conclusion.
'89 had the much better story line. Two former teammates.Two former winners. Fignon coming back after a few years of bad luck and illness. He'd already won the Giro and was going for the double. He had such a strong team. The best DS.
Then you have LeMond coming back from his accident on a small little team getting a tour slot as a wildcard.
Watching the beginning of the Channel Four coverage, LeMond was seen as an afterthought. The TTT saw a dominate performance by Super U. Then LeMond in the TT leading Fignon by 5 seconds. Fignon takes back the jersey but only has a seven-second lead. LeMond retakes the lead on the hilly time trial. Then Fignon bosses it on Alpe d'Huez - then increases his lead to 50 seconds. No one thinks LeMond has a shot. Pulls back 50 on the Champs with the fastest TT ever and wins by only 8 seconds. And you think '87 is better?
It would be a fun exercise to jump on Youtube and watch both again. My opinion might change. But probably not.
Best single stage - 2013 Tour De France stage 13. So many great story lines for a flat stage.