ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!the3verB said:richar virenque deserved at least a win .
One dimensional cry-baby. Less real talent in his whole body than in LA's remaining nut.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!the3verB said:richar virenque deserved at least a win .
Nick C. said:You are totally correct. What I meant was more that they are less focused on the WCs than the classics riders, look at recent history: Contador, Lance, Levi, Klodi, Ullrich, Basso, Sastre to rattle off a few barely bother. You are right tho the guys like Cadel who actually try other than in May or July can be counted on to be in the WCs. For all we know one day a Schleck brother could win.
the3verB said:richar virenque deserved at least a win .
Mambo95 said:It's either Kelly or De Vlaeminck. Either choice is good.
The likes of Indurain, Bartali and Anquetil deserve consideration, but ultimately they didn't build their reputation on one-day races*, which is what the WC is.
(*Yes I know Bartali won the Italian monuments several times)