- Sep 14, 2019
- 704
- 1,259
- 8,180
An other one who I think should be on the list, for at least current riders : Filippo Ganna
This must be a joke...An other one who I think should be on the list, for at least current riders : Filippo Ganna
Lol. There are 100+ riders who also didn't win/are yet to win a monument who should be considered before him. And even among currently active riders you have Pedersen, Ciccone and Matthews who are all clearly ahead of him, as well as Moscon and Hirschi who got screwed out of ≥50% chances of winning one by bad luck.An other one who I think should be on the list, for at least current riders : Filippo Ganna
I'm out of those discussions where bias is even mentioned. And number '30' is just extra artificial layer on top of the 'active riders' layer. But I've already gotten over that a long time ago. Much more interesting to become wiser and expand your horizons by having the discussions delve into the history books. Also the pages you yourself have experienced, but which you have forgotten in the meantime.To avoid too much recency bias I would like to restrict this to only retired riders and active riders 30 and older thus increasingly less likely to make that breakthrough.
Please do contribute because I certainly am interested to dig a little deeper and uncover the classy riders time has not remembered in vivid detail because they could not quite conquer the generational talents of their era.I'm out of those discussions where bias is even mentioned. And number '30' is just extra artificial layer on top of the 'active riders' layer. But I've already gotten over that a long time ago. Much more interesting to become wiser and expand your horizons by having the discussions delve into the history books. Also the pages you yourself have experienced, but which you have forgotten in the meantime.
Spot on. When I read the thread title I automatically thought "among classic riders"This question can be approached in two ways. The best riders in general who never won a monument are Indurain, Zoetemelk, Contador, Froome, Maertens and Ocaña - but most of these are specialists of stage races. A more interesting question is who were the best riders in monuments without winning one.
Now it's free from memory without looking up the numbers, but others pop up on my retina;Here's a list of the riders with the most top 10 places in monuments without winning one. Between brackets is their number of podium places.
- Frans Verbeeeck 28 (8)
- Freddy Maertens 20 (3)
- Michael Boogerd 16/11* (7/6*)
- George Hincapie 16/11* (2/0*)
- Carlo Galetti 16 (4)
- Marc Sergeant 15 (1)
*Boogerd and Hincapie both have five disqualifications.
So Frans Verbeeck is the right answer. He's won Amstel, Flèche, Omloop, E3, Brabantse Pijl and a Belgian title in the era of Merckx and De Vlaeminck, but never a monument. They were going 5 km/h too fast for him.
And here are some other interesting ones. Mads Pedersen should certainly be in the debate with five podium places.
- Fabio Baldato 12 (4)
- Mads Pedersen 11 (5)
- Zdeněk Štybar 10 (2)
- Joop Zoetemelk 10 (0)
- André Dierickx 9 (4)
- Michael Matthews 9 (3)
- Thor Hushovd 8 (4)
- Sep Vanmarcke 8 (3)
- Greg LeMond 6 (3)
Contributed in the meantime while you were postingPlease do contribute because I certainly am interested to dig a little deeper and uncover the classy riders time has not remembered in vivid detail because they could not quite conquer the generational talents of their era.
That was on his Cervelo if I remember correctly. What I'm talking about are flat tires or other issues much earlier in the races like in the Arenberg forest.He did crash, in the same corner, a couple of times in PR. I dont know if that could be entirely attributed to the bike or weak team.
Now it's free from memory without looking up the numbers, but others pop up on my retina;
Edwig Van Hooydonck
It seemed (how could I forget perfect victories in RvV(...) I don't have their exact palmares in my memory or have done any kind of lookups, just my lazy memory.
It all depends on whether the definition is the numbers or "strong riders". Current and former riders in the peloton have been hit by avalanches of accidents, especially in the cobblestone monuments, such as punctures and crashes, also years when they were clear favorites and then years when they get through more easily with a top 5.Lol. There are 100+ riders who also didn't win/are yet to win a monument who should be considered before him. And even among currently active riders you have Pedersen, Ciccone and Matthews who are all clearly ahead of him, as well as Moscon and Hirschi who got screwed out of ≥50% chances of winning one by bad luck.
I'm 100%.sure Adrie won LBL and Flanders so I wonder how much else of this list is wrongSpot on. When I read the thread title I automatically thought "among classic riders"
Now it's free from memory without looking up the numbers, but others pop up on my retina;
Maybe it's just their impressions to me before my eyes and their history, I don't have their exact palmares in my memory or have done any kind of lookups, just my lazy memory. But strong riders in any case.
- Claude Criquielion
- Edwig Van Hooydonck
- Adrie van der Poel
- Juan Antonio Flecha
- Leif Hoste
- Sean Yates
- Dirk De Wof
(atm writing and reading during a coffee break. Speaking, my memory comes to mind as I drink the coffee, now I also think of Jelle Nijdam and Rudy Dhaenens).
That's why I can't rely on my memory anymoreI'm 100%.sure Adrie won LBL and Flanders
so I wonder how much else of this list is wrong
Great post!This question can be approached in two ways. The best riders in general who never won a monument are Indurain, Zoetemelk, Contador, Froome, Maertens and Ocaña - but most of these are specialists of stage races. A more interesting question is who were the best riders in monuments without winning one.
Here's a list of the riders with the most top 10 places in monuments without winning one. Between brackets is their number of podium places.
- Frans Verbeeeck 28 (8)
- Freddy Maertens 20 (3)
- Michael Boogerd 16/11* (7/6*)
- George Hincapie 16/11* (2/0*)
- Carlo Galetti 16 (4)
- Marc Sergeant 15 (1)
*Boogerd and Hincapie both have five disqualifications.
So Frans Verbeeck is the right answer. He's won Amstel, Flèche, Omloop, E3, Brabantse Pijl and a Belgian title in the era of Merckx and De Vlaeminck, but never a monument. They were going 5 km/h too fast for him.
And here are some other interesting ones. Mads Pedersen should certainly be in the debate with five podium places.
- Fabio Baldato 12 (4)
- Mads Pedersen 11 (5)
- Zdeněk Štybar 10 (2)
- Joop Zoetemelk 10 (0)
- André Dierickx 9 (4)
- Michael Matthews 9 (3)
- Thor Hushovd 8 (4)
- Sep Vanmarcke 8 (3)
- Greg LeMond 6 (3)
Lol. There are 100+ riders who also didn't win/are yet to win a monument who should be considered before him. And even among currently active riders you have Pedersen, Ciccone and Matthews who are all clearly ahead of him, as well as Moscon and Hirschi who got screwed out of ≥50% chances of winning one by bad luck.
