nelsonsmen71 said:
Hello, I would like to know, if Eddie Merckx is the only rider in history to have won the Tour Suisse and Tour France in the same year, why is Pinot riding to win the Tour Suisse???? I am a massive fan of his, my favourite rider to be honest and I really had hopes for him this year as Contador cannot win Giro and TDF, Nibali last year won a weak TDF and with Quintana and Froome looking good, this question perplexes me. Surely, firstly the Tour de Suisee wil lstill be in Pinots legs and secondly history is a remarkable marker and the fact only Mercx has done it says its not impossible but highly unlikely. Can anyone shine light on this?????
Not sure if troll, but i'll bite:
Your logic is very flawed. Just because not many riders do good in the TDF after riding Suisse, does not mean the chance to win the TDF is smaller when having raced Suisse than when having raced Dauphiné.
First, Suisse could have an overall lesser field each year when compared to the Dauphiné. i.e. the amount of top riders in the Dauphiné is larger which increases the likelihood a rider from this pool will do good in the TdF.
Second, past results say absolutely nothing about future performance unless the two are directly correlated in some way. Just because the early Tours were dominated by Belgians and Frenchmen doesn't mean the likelihood of these nationalities winning the TdF this year is any higher. The same reasoning applies.
Saying Pinot should forget about winning the Suisse GC because he'll do better in the tour if history is anything to go by, is just plain silly.
That said, I don't think Pinot will take the GC on sunday.