Re:
Maybe I am wrong, I dont want to give my opinion to things I dont know very well, becouse I didnt follow quite well Majka.
He was in Tour climbing with Pinot some days, not all the Tour, to be in GC is really demanding, Majka is meritable becouse he rode before the Giro in GC at a hight level.
If Majka has some problems in the Giro things are different... but I think, that he cant climb like Landa now, I think only Quintana can... but Makja, Quintana, Aru and Pinot are better in ITT, maybe Landa can improve, I dont know, but he is worse.
I thougth Landa was a climber like Aru and Pinot (and Dombroski), but this Giro could change my mind.
damian13ster said:I think you are discounting the fact that Majka had bad food poisoning (or other stomach sickness, I am not sure) during the third week of Giro.
He was climbing with the best and had great TT prior to that. And he was as strong as Pinot in the Tour. I am expecting big things from him this Tour and think we will finally see him climbing with the best. I would like to see a top 10 from him, maybe higher if he doesn't have to set the pace too often. The beginning of the season was worrying but I think he will be fine by the TdF
Maybe I am wrong, I dont want to give my opinion to things I dont know very well, becouse I didnt follow quite well Majka.
He was in Tour climbing with Pinot some days, not all the Tour, to be in GC is really demanding, Majka is meritable becouse he rode before the Giro in GC at a hight level.
If Majka has some problems in the Giro things are different... but I think, that he cant climb like Landa now, I think only Quintana can... but Makja, Quintana, Aru and Pinot are better in ITT, maybe Landa can improve, I dont know, but he is worse.
I thougth Landa was a climber like Aru and Pinot (and Dombroski), but this Giro could change my mind.