- May 15, 2011
- 45,171
- 617
- 24,680
LaFlorecita said:He appeared to have a hunger crisis. For sure he will be among the best again on Saturday.
bambino said:Matteo. said:anyway be careful , froome did not cut the finish line as dead. did not seem to have gone into red so deep
One symptom of fading is that you can't take yourself to the limit anymore...
Yep, I think he's still favourite as well. Though I think it's not even just the time loss that could hurt him today, as much as the belief that he will have given to Nibali that he can win it. Nibali (and maybe others) will now be super motivated to try everything in the next three days now. Whereas before this show of weakness I reckon he would have just put in a hail Mary attack on Angliru, while keeping an eye on defending his 2nd place. Now, surely they will try to make the race as hard as possible and will be 100% focused on the win.PremierAndrew said:I'd still say Froome is favourite, but it's going to be close. If his TT yesterday had been bad, I'd probably give him less than 50% chance, but it's possible it was just a bad day today.
That said, the placement of the Angliru couldn't be worse for Froome.
Either Nibali or Froome is going to lose their second Vuelta on the Angliru on Saturday
DFA123 said:Looks like Froome should have followed his own advice, and not gone so hard in the TT yesterday.
seeing the result today, I would say he must trytelencefalus said:Tomorrow very steep and short finish i would not be surprise if he gain time on nibs
portugal11 said:His team help him a lot in the last kms. He would have lost more than a minute without moscon and nievePricey_sky said:spalco said:TMP402 said:I'd give him a less than 50% chance of winning at this point.
I agree, couple of hard stages coming up, and then Angliru, where a minute lead means nothing if the legs are weak...
His saving grace might be that while Nibali looks strong, he doesn't look superhuman, but it will be really close.
I think everyone is tired at this point, at least he limited his losses reasonably well. He was already at least 20s behind Nibali with 5k to go, so only lost 20s over that really steep 3k section, and of course he still has by far the strongest team here.
Main thing for Froome is to not get caught out over the next 2 stages.
that results would be ideal will see , as i said predictions in cycling are really difficultSeriousSam said:Nibali got hornered up the Angliru. But this time, it might be him hornering Froome
TMP402 said:I'd give him a less than 50% chance of winning at this point.
SeriousSam said:Nibali got hornered up the Angliru. But this time, it might be him Coboing Froome
lt is his fatigue AND the fact that his very small superiority margin in watt per kilo he showed in the 1st week was likely reversed in the 3d week...again due to his relatively deeper fatigue due a 2nd all out gt.movingtarget said:LaFlorecita said:He appeared to have a hunger crisis. For sure he will be among the best again on Saturday.
I think it's more fatigue, as hunger flats usually result in a bigger time loss but who knows ?
Best thing would be to look at the 2012 Vuelta. Froome was full on fading from stage 15 onwards and lost more than a minute on both Cuitu Negru and Bola del Mundo to the best climber (lost 2'30" or something on Cuitu Negru). Thing is that Nibali isn't the dominant climber right now, but the Angliru is definitely harder than any of the 2012 climbs.SeriousSam said:TMP402 said:I'd give him a less than 50% chance of winning at this point.
There's insane value for you on the betfair exchange as of now, though not much liquidity. You can bet against Froome, risking €4 if he wins, winning €20 if he loses.
Red Rick said:Honestly though, his ITT isn't consistent with fading this badly.
LaFlorecita said:He appeared to have a hunger crisis. For sure he will be among the best again on Saturday.
That isn't true, or at least there are not many data points available in GTs. In 2012, his TT was ok - not as good as his tour ones but not awful. Then he faded massively every single day. In 2013, he won the second hilly tour time trial, albeit by less than expected before struggling the last few days. 2015 had no TT. Vuelta 2014 was too early. Tour 2016 was a walk in the park throughout so it is hard to say if he faded at all. Vuelta 2016 he was really second best in the climbs, so once again it's hard to say how his form progressed. But yeah, there's no real evidence to what you say. He does them slightly under par, but that's exactly what this was.PremierAndrew said:This is the thing, when he's been fading, he's done relatively poor TTs too
