The notion that sky somehow revolutionized training is not credible. Everyone knows there are no silver bullets, at least this side of the clinic. Building fatigue resistance is the key, and it takes time and volume. It's all about managing overall load on the razor's edge, so that the riders attain the best possible combination of, and level in, race specific attributes, and do not fall off the cliff a la wile e coyote while trying. Maybe, maybe, sky beat the others in just this till, say, 2018 or so - and this was because of their "scientific" approach and not because of the rider material. But I am not sure, and at a gunpoint would not accept this explanation.
Now, several philosophies about how this is to be achieved exist amongst teams and trainers. Many seem to work. For those interested, take a look at the long thread linked below, which contains batches of data from several riders mined from Strava. Long rides "with intense stuff" to generate high stress levels dominate. Also amongst riders in teams that kick sky in the teeth these days. Fairly mundane, and sensible, approach given the goal. Also very close to the parabled sky volcano camp sessions.
The point being, microscopic attention to detail does not emerge from this admittedly limited but quite likely representative enough data set.
Let’s have a thread to share any info on pro/elite training. I find this topic highly interesting and inspirational. I will make a start: Mathew Hayman Cody Beals, triathlon Michi Weiss, triathlon http://www.srm.de/news/triathlon/2018-season-observations/ BMC racing team, pre-season...
www.trainerroad.com