Who, in your guys opinions, was the best of the clean GC riders during the doping era? Maybe Cadel Evans?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Epicycle said:Depending on how you define the era you would able to make a case for Lemond or Mottet also.
ludwig said:Even Moncoutie is suspect to me. And you can't really call him a GC rider. More like a stage hunter. And I seriously doubt he wins all those Vuelta stages clean...sorry...jaded.
To answer the original question....there probably isn't anyone who meets the standards of your query. Maybe in 10 years time it will come out that some contender was doping a lot less and deserves to be considered the strongest of the era, but we will have to wait 10 years for that.
Both LeMond and Hampsten faded into obscurity with the onset of the EPO era, which kicked into gear in the early '90's. The culmination was probably 1995, when the worlds were in Col. and the Swiss and Italians were raging despite no specific altitude training.Epicycle said:I really doubt Evans is clean. If you are talking about the last ten years it's probably David Moncoutie. If you mean the longer EPO era it could be Hampsten. Depending on how you define the era you would able to make a case for Lemond or Mottet also.
You mean the ex T-Mobile and ex-Mapei rider?Clemson Cycling said:Who, in your guys opinions, was the best of the clean GC riders during the doping era? Maybe Cadel Evans?
i agree. there are too many bias fools in the forum.PCB Free said:Please remember that Jan Ullrich didn't want to have Evans on the Tour team since he didn't have enough "experience"! Since the rest of T-Mobile was reported to be riddled with doping, I find it hard to believe that Ullrich would exclude a rider with as much potential due to lack of "experience".
CPAvelo said:That may have been true before winning the World Championship. Now that he has become an attacker, suspicion now exists that Evans is clean.
ludwig said:Even Moncoutie is suspect to me. And you can't really call him a GC rider. More like a stage hunter. And I seriously doubt he wins all those Vuelta stages clean...sorry...jaded.
To answer the original question....there probably isn't anyone who meets the standards of your query. Maybe in 10 years time it will come out that some contender was doping a lot less and deserves to be considered the strongest of the era, but we will have to wait 10 years for that.
Dekker_Tifosi said:You mean the ex T-Mobile and ex-Mapei rider?
Not a chance.
Dekker_Tifosi said:You mean the ex T-Mobile and ex-Mapei rider?
Not a chance.
djconnel said:Both LeMond and Hampsten faded into obscurity with the onset of the EPO era, which kicked into gear in the early '90's. The culmination was probably 1995, when the worlds were in Col. and the Swiss and Italians were raging despite no specific altitude training.
Doping in the Tour goes back to 1903. Did LeMond dope? I don't know. The story in 1989 was he was low on iron and B12. I have no reason to question that. But he didn't use EPO, that's for sure.
auscyclefan94 said:Guilt by association. Can someone explain the stomach virus thing that happened at t-moile. evans did not race much with tmo as he was injured most the time.
Actually, no rider who currently has a very realistic chance at a GT podium deserves to be mentioned in this thread. It is extremely difficult, if possible, for a very talented clean rider to reach the top 10.Ferminal said:Surprised Evans is always mentioned in these debates, but rarely is Carlos "Mr. Clean" Sastre.
Is it because he's Spanish?