icefire said:Wasn't the biggest stage l'Alpe?![]()
Ventoux was not by much. It was only Ax-3 domaines. He was basically riding for Valverde. After these two it was all Quintana in the Mountains.The Hitch said:So basically if we neutralize the stages Quintana got beaten by froome on because Quintana attacked from further out (on ventoux merely lower on the climb), but then totally ignore the fact that on the 2 stages Quintana beat froome on froome was sooo far ahead on gc he did not need to do anything but get to the finish line, we reach the conclusion that the flawed line of reasoning was designed to reach.
The Hitch said:Froome also announced that he would try and win the worlds![]()
rainman said:It should be Froome because he climbed faster when it really counted, but he looks like a twisted lump of frantically pedalling angle iron. Quintana gets my vote, he is the most gifted and stylish natural climber we have seen for many years. He reminds me of past super climbers Bahamontes, Jimenez, Van Impe and Arroyo.
Afrank said:Pfff, who votes with their head anymore? Besides Quintana's just so much cooler and better looking on the bike then the dawg.![]()
I still think I can get much better. I’m obviously a decent climber but there are things I can do to improve
But remember, Quintana has been steadily improving since he was a child...Froome has only been improving since 2011. So he might be much further away from his peakAfrank said:Froome's 28, Quintana 23. Potential for improvment: advantage Quintana.![]()