The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I think they do if you watch it online. But not normally on tv.
Leipheimer. No way Eurosport engages him however.I've said it before, but they need a GT expert, not another sprinter.........
I've said it before, but they need a GT expert, not another sprinter.........
The obvious answer: Chris HornerI've said it before, but they need a GT expert, not another sprinter.........
Dear god no.The obvious answer: Chris Horner
I want to see the car crash that's the studio debate between Blythe and Horner.Dear god no.
Agreed, but the problem is, who?I've said it before, but they need a GT expert, not another sprinter.........
Oh... so now they felt the need to inform people about the *** regarding a merger with HBO? In a "Oh, this is gonna be amazing" TV add.
You'd have thought it would be something they could have posted on the front page, but... no...
Agreed, but the problem is, who?
Wiggins - already tried, was terrible
Roche Sr, York - fine, but frame of reference seemingly too old for the program's aims
Roche Jr - was tried, seemed decent, but has gone elsewhere
Leipheimer, Vande Velde, Horner, Hesjedal, Danielson - come with significant baggage and many of them unlikely to want to relocate to participate
Evans - doesn't seem to want to
Rogers - is both extremely boring to listen to AND comes with significant baggage
Kennaugh - extremely vanilla
Then you have the still-active riders who ought to be decent enough in the role when they retire. I think Thomas will be a disaster as mentioned, not because of him as I think he'll be absolutely fine, but the others will be so sycophantic around him it will be massively cringe. Hugh Carthy I think would be really good. Chris Froome I'm not convinced would be good on the air, his interviews don't give the air that he'd be super confident with it, a bit like Evans, but he may prove me wrong.
Of people who are out there who could potentially be tried in that kind of role, the obvious name that comes to my mind is Dan Martin, but I don't know how interested he'd be.
Why is it bad? It will be quite a bit cheaper than it is now (HBO and Discovery+ combined).
It appeared as if you'd have to make a new account again.
And is it really cheaper, or are we just paying the same prize for more useless crap? We're already being forced to pay for the biggest package with Discovery+, because apparently someone wanting to just watch sport is a foreign concept.
I haven't seen anything: is this in particular regions?Oh... so now they felt the need to inform people about the *** regarding a merger with HBO? In a "Oh, this is gonna be amazing" TV add.
You'd have thought it would be something they could have posted on the front page, but... no...
You need a Blythe dictionary. Clearly: GC guy= anyone who isn‘t fighting to make the time cutBlythe in today's pre-race show: "out of the GC guys, I think Ganna has the best chance today"
Adam Blythe is paid to be a cycing pundit. Discuss.
You need a Blythe dictionary. Clearly: GC guy= anyone who isn‘t fighting to make the time cut
"Leipheimer, Vande Velde, Horner, Hesjedal, Danielson - come with significant baggage"Johan Bruyneel
The guy is gold. Solid gold.
To be fair, he has come a long way from the days when his punditry was limited to "I was mates with this guy" and "look at the power my mate {name} is putting out!". Now he has been able to expand this all the way to include "look at the power {Ineos rider} is putting out!" too.You need a Blythe dictionary. Clearly: GC guy= anyone who isn‘t fighting to make the time cut