Contador and Froome: Clean or Dirty?

[jens_attacks]

doped is only from jimmy briceno above for me plus dopers is not a nice word to call someone who trains 100000000x more than i ever trained

 

[LaFlorecita]

Option for: Stylish dirty and ugly dirty. But both dirty as hell.

This exactly

 

[rhubroma]

Option for: Stylish dirty and ugly dirty. But both dirty as hell.

Here, here! The more disingenuous may not have even seen that one coming and will be reeling afterward.

 

[kingjr]

Im here to you know

OK, that makes up for it

 

[ralphbert]

Compelled to vote vino but would have preferred vino cleans, everyone else tranquillo.

 

[Jspear]

Option for: Stylish dirty and ugly dirty. But both dirty as hell.

Contador: stylish dirty ; Froome: ugly dirty.

 

[JimmyFingers]

Dunno, and hence I voted that way

 

[Nathan12]

Michelle Option: Froome is dirty in bed but clean on the bike.

 

[Escarabajo]

Both dopers of course.

Yet you voted wrong!!!!

 

[Nathan12]

Would vote for: Whole peloton is clean since 2006, when Jesus appeared out of Siberia to tell everyone that there was a better way.

 

[LaFlorecita]

Yet you voted wrong!!!!

See my conversation with red_Flanders upthread

 

[sniper]

Is it technically possible to postulate Dirty aint dirty?

Wonder btw if they,re on the same dope or if contador has sticked to his old techniques whilst froome is into more experimental stuff.

 

[Beech Mtn]

Would vote for: Whole peloton is clean since 2006, when Jesus appeared out of Siberia to tell everyone that there was a better way.

Yes. Yes he did.

 

[Andynonomous]

The result does tell us who will deliberately promote a lie.

Proving it really doesn't matter to fanboys, whether their "hero" is doping, or not. They will support them regardless.

What does this say about their character ?

 

[Nathan12]

I only care about the people who voted for the third, fifth and sixth options. Everyone else is justified.

 

[Netserk]

The result does tell us who will deliberately promote a lie.

Proving it really doesn't matter to fanboys, whether their "hero" is doping, or not. They will support them regardless.

What does this say about their character ?

That for some people, whether to support a rider or not depends on more than just 'Does he dope?'.

 

[red_flanders]

Compelled to vote vino but would have preferred vino cleans, everyone else tranquillo.

Tranquillo = Cleans

 

[Andynonomous]

That for some people, whether to support a rider or not depends on more than just 'Does he dope?'.

I am not talking about SUCKERS who support a lying, cheating, thief (like Lance Armstrong).

I am talking about the PROPOGANDISTS that KNOW their "hero" is a lying, cheating thief, then go onto public forums to "argue" that their hero is clean, when they KNOW it isn't true.

 

[Netserk]

I am not talking about SUCKERS who support a lying, cheating, thief (like Lance Armstrong).

I am talking about the PROPOGANDISTS that KNOW their "hero" is a lying, cheating thief, then go onto public forums to "argue" that their hero is clean, when they KNOW it isn't true.

Who have revealed themselves in this thread/poll to be belonging (grammar?) to the second group?

 

[Andynonomous]

Who have revealed themselves in this thread/poll to be belonging (grammar?) to the second group?

?

Has not Florecita admitted to trying to have it both ways ?

Are you trying to say that there were no Armstrong propagandists on this forum (until he "confessed") ?

Are you saying there aren't Contador propagandists here arguing that he is clean now (Robby Canuck) ?

 

[Granville57]

Has not Florecita admitted to trying to have it both ways ?

No. Flo has admitted to having a good laugh. Nothing more.

Are you trying to say that there were no Armstrong propagandists on this forum (until he "confessed") ?

Not meaning to speak for netserk, but he specifically referred to this thread (as that is what you seemed to be basing the accusations on).

Are you saying there aren't Contador propagandists here arguing that he is clean now (Robby Canuck) ?

Well, consider the source. I mean, really.
(Not to mention: You don't have Robbie on "ignore"?)

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

Contador: stylish dirty ; Froome: ugly dirty.

or... AC stylish dirty (at least until his ban, then cleanish, then may back to dirty) vs. Froome ugly "don´t know" option

 

[Archibald]

I vote I don't know, but it should be I don't know about now but in the past Contador almost certainly was a doper.

once a doper...
i'm sure Tyler no longer dopes, but you'd still think of him as a doper

 

[LaFlorecita]

I only care about the people who voted for the third, fifth and sixth options. Everyone else is justified.

.......

 

[LaFlorecita]

That for some people, whether to support a rider or not depends on more than just 'Does he dope?'.

Well said Netserk!!