once again, though useful and interesting, all estimates of the absolute performance (be it in watts or meters per hour climbed) need to include (+/-) tolerance. i'm afraid, the tolerance is wider than many think...
a strong head, wind, for example, on certain sections (or alternatively a tail wind) can completely skew absolute estimates.
the relative performances though, are easier to visualize and put into a perspective. in a (more or less) 20 minute effort conta demonstrated 4 to 5% superiority. (edit) this is the only parameter i will put in my long term memory cells. that is, until i personally see conta's vo2 max (or ftp) test or his watts record on a climb provided his srm was properly calibrated.
at this level it's huge. it's dominance !
any arguments as to where the dominance was derived from, are up to an individual clinic dweller.