The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Netserk said:If not for the crash today, but still with the ITT crash, no.
Without both crashes, maybe, but not the most likely result.
Vino attacks everyone said:nnnnnnoooooooobbbbbbbbbbbooooooooodddddddyyyyyyyyyyyyy ccccaaaaarrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeesssssssssss
![]()
Are you serious?Afrank said:Without either crash he could have beaten Froome
No, there are few riders ahead of him already, and he won't be improving. Your comment was extemporaneous.Afrank said:You think Froome would have beaten him?
cineteq said:No, there are few riders ahead of him already, and he won't be improving. Your comment was extemporaneous.
There you go I voted YES tooferryman said:No it wasn't, the OP, if I read him correctly was asking an opinion before NQ's crashes. I voted yes.
Well, he would've won the whole thing, beating both.Afrank said:I don't see how. The OP asked if he was up to the task of beating Contador and Froome. Without any crashes I think he would have beaten Froome but not Contador.
cineteq said:There you go I voted YES too
Well, he would've won the whole thing, beating both.
damian13ster said:Froome? Possibly, depending how he does in 3rd week.
Contador? only if Alberto crashed
Meant to say that the only scenario in which Quintana beats Contador in this Vuelta is if the latter crashes. If both are able to stay on the bike, Alberto wns by a mile.Jspear said: