I can separate things to actually be objective. For instance, before MSR and Roubaix, I said both prior to the race and after that MvdP was the favorite to win and won deserwingly cause he did! Im not really a fan like that I just tell it like it is more so than anything. It was the most sensible conclusion based on numbers and route, it’s never really deeper than that for me, never.
I’ll be the first in line when someone out brute-forces Pogacar without an asterisk on a climb—don’t you worry there. With the numbers we have today, rather than ancient history that’s totally irrelevant and based only on wishful thinking especially since it isnt close it gets hillarious, thats all and looking behind get you nowhere in life and when people do this over and over and gets surprised I just find that hillarious thats all. Anyone who understands the numbers now knows it’s not even remotely close to any gap weve seen its actually kinda scary the numbers throughout. Pointing that out isn’t anything but objective, in my opinion. Whatever not important, but nevertheless the case. And obviously, I enjoy him too, yes.
Regarding the stuff about Lefevere and other riders without contract—sure, I agree . And my point about MvdP as an example as overkill wasn’t meant negatively, I dont mind overkill on the contrary as prior post about Boonen, I like extraordinary talents. MvdP has that like few others ever have had and just as fan of him as anyone else, he stands for everything I personally find interesting if im first gonne watch a sport. I didn’t mean it in a bad way, just that many of their wins came more from tactical execution rather than a single rider being dominant. I can appriciate both.