Well, that was his choice when he left EF. But he will now have more chances at Ineos after this Giro.A shame he's on a team where he can't ride for himself.
Well, that was his choice when he left EF. But he will now have more chances at Ineos after this Giro.
Tbf to Ineos, they do have a good record of giving leadership roles in other races to their GT domestiques. Be it 1-week races, other GTs, classics, whatever.Yep. Ineos will definitely trust him after this - easy to see a situation where he gets a free role. or if Bernal's back acted up you could see a Martinez/Carapaz double act at the Vuelta easily etc.
It's probably a good experience for him too being in part of a ruthless winning machine and he'll be at a great age when he's making his next decisions so I'd imagine he'll have plenty of opportunities to go race for himself elsewhere if that's what he wants.
Not in GTs. Once Froome started adding the Vuelta after winning the Tour, they just sacked the Giro for their 2ndary contenders but if Bernal want to win the Vuelta too that is over.Tbf to Ineos, they do have a good record of giving leadership roles in other races to their GT domestiques. Be it 1-week races, other GTs, classics, whatever.
I wonder if Ineos acquired him as a super dom (Yates, Porte) or as a future GT contender, though. You can point to weaknesses in all of their current top GC guys, except maybe Carapaz, who I think is still improving.Not in GTs. Once Froome started adding the Vuelta after winning the Tour, they just sacked the Giro for their 2ndary contenders but if Bernal want to win the Vuelta too that is over.
What they have done is get their domestiques so good that they can get as high as #2 while working for their leader.
100% got him as a super domestique/also top 10 guy, not as future multi GT winner. They got Bernal and Sivakov to be the latter.I wonder if Ineos acquired him as a super dom (Yates, Porte) or as a future GT contender, though. You can point to weaknesses in all of their current top GC guys, except maybe Carapaz, who I think is still improving.
i would not be surprised if he is a coleader at the Giro next year.
Unfortunately, at Ineos, a genuine GT contender usually most work for another genuine GT contender. It has been like that for years.
100% got him as a super domestique/also top 10 guy, not as future multi GT winner. They got Bernal and Sivakov to be the latter.
Praise Vino they missed out on Pogacar.
So... the trick is to be the genuine GT contender the other genuine GT conteder(s) will have to work for.
When it comes to Sky/Ineos this becomes a bit moot. In reality they likely just tell you what is your role and you don't really have a choice. Paycheck is the leverage they likely have over you. And you do need to feed your family in the end. The situation can be a bit similar in some other teams, at times, but Sky/Ineos took this to another level. That is why they win many races and that is why they don't win much of that other thing.
Yes in GTs, situation dependent. Let’s not forget, Froome, Thomas, TGH and Bernal, all started out riding for others before (for whatever reason) getting to lead the team. Even Tao was a “co-leader” at the 2018 Vuelta (ok, they basically wrote that one off, but they did go in giving Hart and Kwiatkowski their chance to shine). Carapaz was signed as a dom before he won the Giro, but he has been given the lead in races since.Not in GTs. Once Froome started adding the Vuelta after winning the Tour, they just sacked the Giro for their 2ndary contenders but if Bernal want to win the Vuelta too that is over.
What they have done is get their domestiques so good that they can get as high as #2 while working for their leader.
Still, the occassional wild Geoghegan Hart might still pop up.
And when that one genuine GT contender (Porte, Landa) had later a chance to ride for himself in another team, it turned out he's no longer that much of a genuine GT contenderUnfortunately, at Ineos, a genuine GT contender usually most work for another genuine GT contender. It has been like that for years.
And when that one genuine GT contender (Porte, Landa) had later a chance to ride for himself in another team, it turned out he's no longer that much of a genuine GT contender![]()
As far as I remember Landa is out of the race for a while now. And the first condition of being a real GT contender is to not reguralry crash out of it.It depends, against who. Landa on this Giro edition, against Bernal, with or without Martínez? Against Bernal in some other team?
Moot.
As far as I remember Landa is out of the race for a while now. And the first condition of being real GT contender is to not reguralry crash out of it.
I agree, no point in debating that. As said earlier i don't hold it against Ineos but from time to time it needs to be said. That is their wins don't only come from some brilliant sport point of view. And it's not like they are not aware of it:
![]()
P.S. In addition Slovenians introduced some much needed balance in the peloton. Hence the whole Ineos situation is not that bad ATM. Lets just enjoy that.