Dave Brailsford - cycling genius

Page 33 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Oct 6, 2009
5,270
2
0
thehog said:
Brailsford is certainly losing the plot, he is over PR'd and become an embarrassment:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/38573615

Double speak, double hand movements, waffling, making no sense.

Perhaps "Sir" Dave can hire Cound to handle his PR?

Sample interview:

Walsh: Who ordered the sending of the Jiffy bag? Who's in charge here?
Brailsford: I control everything.
Cound: Not fully.
 
Re:

Mr.38% said:
Give him white gloves and add some Breakdance music from the 80ies.

I'm thinking about a less appreciated Jackson classic ;)

Smooth Criminal

As he came into the window
It was the sound of a crescendo
He came into her apartment
He left the bloodstains on the carpet
She ran underneath the table
He could see she was unable
So she ran into the bedroom
She was struck down, it was her doom
Annie, are you ok?
So, Annie are you ok
Are you ok, Annie
Annie, are you ok?
.
..
You've been hit by
You've been hit by
A smooth criminal .... <fade out>
 
First we had Sutton lecturing the MP's for not being the great flag waving patriot's.

Now we have Brailsford attacking Kenworthy for commenting on his non cooperation. These people think they are infallible and the public are mugs (I suppose for a long time they were used to the latter). That Brailsford press conference yesterday was desperate on Brailsford's behalf, at last a journalist asking some proper questions.
 
Re: Re:

thehog said:
Benotti69 said:
thehog said:
pastronef said:
42x16ss said:
But an English member of Team Sky could go on a shooting spree in Central London and still get excused by most of the Bikeradar forumites.

would this be important? I dont read bikeradar but by the many comments I read here, the clinic members who read bikeradar havent anything good to say about bikeradar members.
so why be bothered about those bikeradar forumites if you rate them and their opinion so low?

Why? Because it's funny as hell thats why! :lol:

Where's your sense of humour at the those so blinded by being Brailsford/Sky fanboys they can't even being themselves to admit that Wiggins doped?

In all seriousness, it is also a good example that nothing has moved on or been learnt by the Lance Armstrong effect. Patriotism tends to lead the blind into darkness.


Brailsford saw this and it is why he made such a big deal of it being a British team, and their goal of getting the 1st British winner of the TdF.

Rapha saw the potential too and have it appears saw the writing on the wall and sold to a bigger corp.


BikeRadar knows best :lol:

IMG_9724.jpg

People are at their most agressive when they feel threatened.

That lot our clearly scared shitless. That their greatest fears- their pin up heroes, really were the frauds everyone with 2 braincells always saw them for
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Dangerous to throw Wiggins under the bus. Very dangerous.

Brailsford's ego wont let him walk away, think she can ride it out and be back on top. Not going to happen. Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

Benotti69 said:
Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
Can see Tinkoff with a decent smile on his face.
Think Heath Ledger as the Joker.
DB climbed up that moral high horse. Now he has to humbly climb down.
 
Re: Re:

sniper said:
Benotti69 said:
Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
Can see Tinkoff with a decent smile on his face.
Think Heath Ledger as the Joker.
DB climbed up that moral high horse. Now he has to humbly climb down.

I want to know what was the team Brailsford was about to drop in the *** for the story to go away? Tinkoff? Astana?
 
Re: Re:

thehog said:
sniper said:
Benotti69 said:
Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
Can see Tinkoff with a decent smile on his face.
Think Heath Ledger as the Joker.
DB climbed up that moral high horse. Now he has to humbly climb down.

I want to know what was the team Brailsford was about to drop in the **** for the story to go away? Tinkoff? Astana?

me too, and I also want to know who leaked the Jiffybag story to the press
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re: Re:

thehog said:
sniper said:
Benotti69 said:
Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
Can see Tinkoff with a decent smile on his face.
Think Heath Ledger as the Joker.
DB climbed up that moral high horse. Now he has to humbly climb down.

I want to know what was the team Brailsford was about to drop in the **** for the story to go away? Tinkoff? Astana?
Exactly.
Why isn't he reporting those cheating competitors to the authorities. :rolleyes: :lol:

@pastronef: if u think about timing and motivation it's an easy one, really.
 
Re: Re:

pastronef said:
thehog said:
sniper said:
Benotti69 said:
Bet the rest of the peloton are having a nice laugh about this.
Can see Tinkoff with a decent smile on his face.
Think Heath Ledger as the Joker.
DB climbed up that moral high horse. Now he has to humbly climb down.

I want to know what was the team Brailsford was about to drop in the **** for the story to go away? Tinkoff? Astana?

me too, and I also want to know who leaked the Jiffybag story to the press

Brailsford is very much Lance in all of this. He sees each interview as a challenge to turn the crowd back in his favour. But he uses double speak rather than Lance being 100% direct. Armstrong was way more convincing, Brailsford looks terrible. I'm sure he's done some good work in his time at Sky but it's all being undone because he looks more and more like a teenager lying about what time they got in the previous evening.

It also appears to be a British thing to hire PR and attempt to slime your way out of a problem. The American method is to confess all your sins and cry a little, which is the faster route to redemption.
 
I am convinced some in this forum don't understand process - Kenworthy the Head of UKAD should not be seen or heard - His agency has the job to run a professional investigation, to try to find evidence as to what is contained in the mystery package, and if necessarys charge Wiggins and/or others with an Anti-Doping Violation - Kenworthy has no role making press statements and allegations in the press - One of the central tenets of NADOC's is confidentiality and privacy - I am surprised Kenworthy still has a job.
 
Re:

yaco said:
I am convinced some in this forum don't understand process - Kenworthy the Head of UKAD should not be seen or heard - His agency has the job to run a professional investigation, to try to find evidence as to what is contained in the mystery package, and if necessarys charge Wiggins and/or others with an Anti-Doping Violation - Kenworthy has no role making press statements and allegations in the press - One of the central tenets of NADOC's is confidentiality and privacy - I am surprised Kenworthy still has a job.
 
Re:

yaco said:
I am convinced some in this forum don't understand process - Kenworthy the Head of UKAD should not be seen or heard - His agency has the job to run a professional investigation, to try to find evidence as to what is contained in the mystery package, and if necessarys charge Wiggins and/or others with an Anti-Doping Violation - Kenworthy has no role making press statements and allegations in the press - One of the central tenets of NADOC's is confidentiality and privacy - I am surprised Kenworthy still has a job.


True in some respects. However it's clear he can't get any evidence because Sky/Brailsford/Wiggins and Freeman won't talk. Brailsford by coming out and stating "we are confident that no wrong-doing will be found" then stonewalling the investigation it blatant bullying. Sky are not transparent, they are anything but transparent and they have no respect for the "process" he expects UKAD to follow.
 
Re: Re:

thehog said:
yaco said:
I am convinced some in this forum don't understand process - Kenworthy the Head of UKAD should not be seen or heard - His agency has the job to run a professional investigation, to try to find evidence as to what is contained in the mystery package, and if necessarys charge Wiggins and/or others with an Anti-Doping Violation - Kenworthy has no role making press statements and allegations in the press - One of the central tenets of NADOC's is confidentiality and privacy - I am surprised Kenworthy still has a job.


True in some respects. However it's clear he can't get any evidence because Sky/Brailsford/Wiggins and Freeman won't talk. Brailsford by coming out and stating "we are confident that no wrong-doing will be found" then stonewalling the investigation it blatant bullying. Sky are not transparent, they are anything but transparent and they have no respect for the "process" he expects UKAD to follow.

For a Non Adverse Analytical doping violation it's up to UKAD to find evidence to issue an Infraction notice - Now the media will always ask questions, write articles, proffer opinions and so forth - But for the head of UKAD to give a running commentary through the media, is unprofessional and unbefitting of his position - It's simple - The media and social media can discuss this as often as we want, but UKAD should remain silent - Kenworthy's lack of judgement and professionalism has no relationship to Sky's bullying or lack of transparency.
 
Totally agree. Let's not forget either - British Cycling & Sky have said they have handed over all documentation they have been asked for and UKAD 'raided' BC HQ too, although I think 'raided' is pushing it a little by the Daily Mail lol!

If UKAD don't have the information required to complete the investigation from Sky's & BCs documents to confirm Fluamicil or something else, then that is the point their investigation concluded to. The next step would be for CAS to get involved with UKAD claiming BC & Sky are witholding information. End of the day the investigation has mostly followed NADOC, it's just cycling is so used to the investigation being public and with running commentary w're shocked when it isn't and accuse everyone of not calling a spade a spade.
 
samhocking said:
Totally agree. Let's not forget either - British Cycling & Sky have said they have handed over all documentation they have been asked for and UKAD 'raided' BC HQ too, although I think 'raided' is pushing it a little by the Daily Mail lol!

If UKAD don't have the information required to complete the investigation from Sky's & BCs documents to confirm Fluamicil or something else, then that is the point their investigation concluded to. The next step would be for CAS to get involved with UKAD claiming BC & Sky are witholding information. End of the day the investigation has mostly followed NADOC, it's just cycling is so used to the investigation being public and with running commentary w're shocked when it isn't and accuse everyone of not calling a spade a spade.

All documentation? You mean they handed over what they say they have, which apparently does not include the final prescription.

Thankfully, the Government can compel Brailsford, Wiggins and co to fess up or perhaps they'll refuse to show like Coe?

Gotta love transparency the Sky way <insert emoji of Brailsford using a two handed gesture>
 
thehog said:
samhocking said:
Totally agree. Let's not forget either - British Cycling & Sky have said they have handed over all documentation they have been asked for and UKAD 'raided' BC HQ too, although I think 'raided' is pushing it a little by the Daily Mail lol!

If UKAD don't have the information required to complete the investigation from Sky's & BCs documents to confirm Fluamicil or something else, then that is the point their investigation concluded to. The next step would be for CAS to get involved with UKAD claiming BC & Sky are witholding information. End of the day the investigation has mostly followed NADOC, it's just cycling is so used to the investigation being public and with running commentary w're shocked when it isn't and accuse everyone of not calling a spade a spade.

All documentation? You mean they handed over what they say they have, which apparently does not include the final prescription.

Thankfully, the Government can compel Brailsford, Wiggins and co to fess up or perhaps they'll refuse to show like Coe?

Gotta love transparency the Sky way <insert emoji of Brailsford using a two handed gesture>

You dont get it - UKAD is supposed to be independent of the Government - They determine whether an Anti-Doping Violation has been committed - The Government can compel citizens to appear before Select Committees but their BRIEF is not Anti-Doping - Australia had enough issues when the Goverment interfered with ASADA in 2013/2014 in the EFC 34 and Cronulla 12 cases.
 
Dec 18, 2013
241
0
0
As a Brit I'm confused by the constant reference by posters on here to Sky/BC's alleged fraudulent use of government money....this isn't U.S. Postal where a government run institution was funding a cycling team (and subsequently doping).
The Sky team doesn't take a penny from the UK government, it's a Murdoch enterprise and Manchester/BC is lottery funded, I don't play the lottery so I don't feel defrauded, it's not compulsory to buy a ticket!
Buy a ticket and help put some money into most Olympic sports or don't, choice is the punters...i don't think some on here get that.

All talk of jail time, the government trying to recoup funds etc is fantasy by posters on here who don't understand the system of sport funding in the UK, the government actually contributes very little and most goes to schools not professional setups.
That is why little will come of this, sorry to burst some bubbles.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re:

deviant said:
As a Brit I'm confused by the constant reference by posters on here to Sky/BC's alleged fraudulent use of government money....this isn't U.S. Postal where a government run institution was funding a cycling team (and subsequently doping).
The Sky team doesn't take a penny from the UK government, it's a Murdoch enterprise and Manchester/BC is lottery funded, I don't play the lottery so I don't feel defrauded, it's not compulsory to buy a ticket!
Buy a ticket and help put some money into most Olympic sports or don't, choice is the punters...i don't think some on here get that.

All talk of jail time, the government trying to recoup funds etc is fantasy by posters on here who don't understand the system of sport funding in the UK, the government actually contributes very little and most goes to schools not professional setups.
That is why little will come of this, sorry to burst some bubbles.

Lottery funded is money from the people.

Government funding is tax payers money from the people.

I am not sure lottery funds spent flying fluimicil to France from Manchester comes under lottery funding policy.