For me the interview presented a great study of a Sociopath caught in the headlights.
Lance,s manner was pretty much as its always been... belligerent. To the Sociopath life is a process..hence the use of that word so often in describing events . A process described as statement of fact. Lacking the emotion most people experience and give away in there body language when describing both difficult and joyous moments.
If we understand the condition of the true Sociopath to be a developmental flaw then we dont have to look hard in his formative years to see were that may have happened.
Sadly there is no cure for the the genuine Sociopath and the fact of the matter is what Lance has done could not have happened without the involvement of other Sociopaths and the gullibility of people to ignore what is now admitted but now , for many, in retrospect, so obvious.
Lance hasn't changed his body language but the peoples perception of him has ergo proving that a desire to believe in something often runs the danger of ignoring what we deeper down really " know".
Is he I,ll?..not in the genuine sense no.
The lessons to be learnt from the Armstrong case are less about him than they are about ourselves in many cases.
So am I angry with him?..No. He`s a Sociopath. " we" gave him the power,s he had, " we" fell for the hype. And by " we " I mean there are people far more responsible than others..the Myth makers, the Marketers , being the worst. Cus they always knew it was a lie.