The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
bladerunner said:Well Done to Mr Ernesto Colnago & his team for making this happen now.
The current UCI rules do not allow disc-brakes for road races so it will take a while before the pros/top-riders use them. I suppose the immediate market is for the serious sportif riders.
RDV4ROUBAIX said:Awesome! Simply awesome!! I wonder what the rear spacing on the C59D is, 130, or 135? This is going to be the deal breaker I think. Once a standard for road disk is agreed upon we could very well also see the departure of 130mm rears just as 126mm died in the 80's-90's.
They have to be custom Di2 with hydraulic levers. I really expected to see a serious CX bike first especially since this is not road race legal (yet)richwagmn said:I don't get the build they did. I see Shimano DA DI2 but with some custom Colnago brake levers. Are they making their own brifters for use with DI2?
LugHugger said:Surely the standard will be 135 since it already is for mtb?
DirtyWorks said:Well, don't bank on it. That's practically too much braking power for the road.
Someone's going to come out with a 80-90mm rotor that will sweep big-money consumers off their feet.
Also note, Colnago's got the disc version of their 'cross product posted too. Talk about overkill!
Boeing said:The rear width standard is actually a god question.
The rear standard for Mountain Bike is shifting away from the 135 as you know DW. but for different reasons
DirtyWorks said:Well, don't bank on it. That's practically too much braking power for the road racer. Someone's going to come out with a smaller rotor that will sweep big-money consumers off their feet.
Also note, Colnago's got the disc version of their 'cross product posted too. Talk about overkill!
I'm assuming the Colnago carbon is an OEM product which means you should see a couple more brands releasing a similar bike in 2012 until the bigger OEM's are done waiting for some standards to settle and Shimano to be up to full-speed on producing the levers. Even then supply of the lever mechanism will be constrained for a while.
Hey, Colnago doesn't do gimmicks -- look at how their C50 made split chainstays a standard for road bikes. Now with discs, people who have never lifted the rear wheel under hard braking can have even more stopping power.Stingray34 said:Yep, superannuated fat old blokes drive the upper-end bike industry...a lot of furry little lycras are sacrificied to make their assos kits.
Yes, I'm sure a standard to accommodate discs will proceed as smoothly as the bottom bracket standard(s).FignonLeGrand said:...all bikes.
Gaear Grimsrud said:I'm sure discs have a future, just as electronic shifting has a future: as a niche for those who can't spend enough on their bicycles.
So you're going to have to have a wet weather bike and a fair weather bike? And how hard can you really brake with the traction available with 20-23mm tires in the wet? (In my experience with aluminum rims in the wet, I have too much stopping power for 23mm tires. Disc brakes would be complete overkill for the conditions.) You'd have to run wider tires to make the disc brakes worth it, whose weight probably wouldn't appeal to someone trying to get UP the climb as quickly as possible.rgmerk said:Have you ever done a technical descent - particularly on carbon wheels - on a wet day?
steelciocc said:I'm with Gaear on this one. An answer to a non-existent problem that we'll all be encouraged to spend our hard earned money on...
Gaear Grimsrud said:Hey, Colnago doesn't do gimmicks -- look at how their C50 made split chainstays a standard for road bikes. Now with discs, people who have never lifted the rear wheel under hard braking can have even more stopping power.
Why the past tense? If they weren't a gimmick, they'd be on current models.RDV4ROUBAIX said:HP stays weren't a gimmick
Gaear Grimsrud said:Why the past tense? If they weren't a gimmick, they'd be on current models.