TERMINATOR said:
Tell those amateurs you know who dope they are spending more money to dope than what they win because of doping. Then tell me what they say. If they don't have an intelligent response, then they're stupid and you should tell them that.
Anybody who races a bike and doesn't do it for monetary gain is pretty stupid. Accidents, injury, travel expenses, huge time commitment for training are massive intrusions and negatives to one's life that guarantee anyone who races a bike should only do it for the money. And there's simply not enough money in amateur cycling to justify a doping program.
If people are racing for reasons other than money, then that's a bit weird, not to mention stupid.
You know the elite /espoir guys on "continental" teams (like Rabobank CT) and national teams in lower ranked national tours are all amateurs right? They have sponsorship, equipment, and often enjoy a support network similar to that of pro riders, but don't receive any (or a full) salary and are not professional.
In fact these are the ranks from which pro riders are recruited from, and it is massively competitive. Here in NL there are about 2/3 riders who make it as a pro each year, from a pool of about 30 guys riding at top amateur level, and about 8-10 who are pro material. Belgium is similar.
Most of the amateur team directors are ex pro riders, and many of the riders have fathers, uncles etc who raced top level.
There are also zero controls at criterium races in NL, with big cash prizes, and I rode 2 yrs as elite rider in NL and Belgium and was never tested once. I raced alongside such riders as VdB (once) Dave Bruylandts, Jonny Hoogerland....
If you think there is no doping going on at this amateur level, and no reason to then you are mistaken and naive.
Remember - elite license holders are amateurs too, despite the world of difference between their level and that of Cat 4 weekend warriors.