Is this true or can we classify this as dumb stuff fans say?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Some picks are definitely very weird. Stage 9 of the 2020 TdF as number 4 is an incredibly bad take and including stage 16 of the 2022 Vuelta is honestly bad taste. The only memorable thing about that day is that a rider got injured.
Is this true or can we classify this as dumb stuff fans say?
and including stage 16 of the 2022 Vuelta is honestly bad taste. The only memorable thing about that day is that a rider got injured.
Wouldn't me missing the stage make it interesting by default? On a more serious note, okay Roglic attacked and gained a few seconds, so it's not like it was a crash in a full on bunch sprint. But the only reason this stage is memorable is because someone got injured.You don't think the late attack was rather interesting?
Or, was this one of the races you missed?
Wouldn't me missing the stage make it interesting by default? On a more serious note, okay Roglic attacked and gained a few seconds, so it's not like it was a crash in a full on bunch sprint. But the only reason this stage is memorable is because someone got injured.
It's very hard to rank them. Maybe it's easier to start off by ranking different kinds of stages (I've included at least 1 stage from each GT):Some picks are definitely very weird. Stage 9 of the 2020 TdF as number 4 is an incredibly bad take and including stage 16 of the 2022 Vuelta is honestly bad taste. The only memorable thing about that day is that a rider got injured.
Other than that, I actually think they are actually underrating stages 9 and 11 of this years Tour which I think were both fantastic and I'm sure they forgot about some other stuff. Stage 20 of the 2020 Giro, the Sepp Kuss stage in last years Vuelta and the Hazallanas stage this year are three stages immediately coming to my mind which I think were much better than a number of stages on the list. But the thing is, enjoyment of a stage is so subjective that it's kind of hard to say any pick here is outright wrong. I can only question the author's taste.
I don't see by what objective metric Planche was a better TT than Lussari because the 2020 Tour was basically decided at the base of the climb.
The objective metric were the intermediate time splits. The subjective metric are overwhelming opinions and the fact the TdF is simply a much bigger race than the Giro. The pressure at the Tour is immense. Not so much the Giro.I don't see by what objective metric Planche was a better TT than Lussari because the 2020 Tour was basically decided at the base of the climb.