- Jan 27, 2012
- 15,676
- 3,100
- 28,180
Startlist: https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/e3-harelbeke/2026/startlist
Still rooting for Bettiol, but my confidence is fragile.
Live coverage is early, but not sure.
He essentially chose DDV over E3. No contender will ride all 3 classics in the lead up to RVV. Not that crazy, imo, especially since riding DDV gives him one opportunity to win a race without Pogacar or van der Poel present.Why would Wout not come here? I think it would make perfect sense, no?
I guess they just showed interest? Cofidis apparently decided not to come, and Intermarché and Wallonie folding freed up two spots as well this year. E3 didn't even (get to?) use all wildcards.Why are Burgos getting all these nonsense invites?
Perhaps because he knows that the winner of E3 (if you take Boonen) doesn’t win RvVWhy would Wout not come here? I think it would make perfect sense, no?
Same, this is a great race imho.One of my favourite non-monument races on the calendar. Nearly always produces a select group and a strong winner.
Winner of E3 also won RVV two years ago.Perhaps because he knows that the winner of E3 (if you take Boonen) doesn’t win RvV![]()
Perhaps because he knows that the winner of E3 (if you take Boonen) doesn’t win RvV![]()
Van der Poel is the clear favourite but I am curious to see how close Pedersen will be to him.
- 1976 Walter Planckaert
- 1979 Jan Raas
- 1998 Johan Museeuw
- 1999 Peter Van Petegem
- 2005 Tom Boonen
- 2006 Tom Boonen
- 2012 Tom Boonen
- 2024 MvdP
Somehow it seems to be unavoidable to always overlook one when you compile a list like this. So it's 18% - scientifically proven!Aren't you forgetting someone?
Missing Abrakadabra hereIt seems like Belgian press struggled a bit today to find enough contenders, resulting in a somewhat random looking star rating
***** van der Poel
**** M. Pedersen, Laporte
*** Stuyven, T. van Dijke, F. Vermeersch
** van Baarle, Grégroire, Mohoric, de Gendt
* Berckmoes, Segaert, Girmay, Pithie, Lund
Somehow it seems to be unavoidable to always overlook one when you compile a list like this. So it's 18% - scientifically proven!
