deValtos said:
Some people won't be happy until we get golf level commentary.
Anyways Kirby is still the most popular for good reason. As I've said before many people here fail to realize that the type of people that are interested enough to post on cycling forums throughout the year are a pretty small demographic.
So that is it ?..a choice between golf coverage and the idiot that is Kirby
Just because we dont want the golf type why should we accept Kirby, even if we pay for the coverage ? Talk about second rate options
There are many other options like someone who can inject enthusiasm but also is sane and informed and unbias...what is wrong with having that objective ? em ? Do we as cycling fans not deserve a proper commentary team?
Like the story about above how someone frined was attracted to the coverage because they heard Kirby yelling but by no stroke of the imagination are now a cycling fan ? what does that prove...We all stop and gawk at a crash ...and that is what Kirby is ...a TV car crash...
This is not the way into increasing a fan base for the sport and to think so is very deluded