scribe said:
A few not so random things....
You are right and no one in their right mind would be able to usurp Armstrong before he retires for good.
- I like Evans because he's not the political correct type of person striving to be media darling, though i discovered him wearing pro Tibet socks

- Actually I find Andy Schleck might even admire armstrong, but he gave an interesting pre Ventoux interview shutting down Versus reporter "I think LA should worry more about me than me about him" quite French to me this guy.
- I dont think one should be distracted by "riding to win" and "riding with stars". I think Andy has established himself as a legitimate contender, he should focus on a team that will serve his purpose, unless he's retiring peut- tetre an all star team will be a consolation.
-We will never in a position like Contador or someone that could win the Tour, so I can only imagine that "singular ambition" is what it takes to win the Tour. Dont forget Armstrong was even ruthless when he was winning his 7 titles (he didnt even pass the stage win to Kloden at le grand Bornard). So is it right that you prefer "singular ambition" in some but not others?
-For Wiggins to win - he has to demonstrate that he's an all rounder and his ability to attack in the mountain. Until then it is too premature to talk about his winning chances.
-And you're right too, no one in their right mind would be able to usurp Armstrong, who has much success at "attacking" in the media. NYmag had an approval matrix where it says about LA - "The King is dead, Long live Alberto Contador". I thought that was interesting.