- Apr 22, 2009
- 190
- 0
- 0
Why not?
Umm, he was top of the sport when the pro peleton was 99.9% dirty. So, either he was naturally better than not just the whole rest of the peleton, but the whole rest of the peleton on dope, or he was a doper. That's very unfair logic, I know, but there it is.
Obviously, Greg's zeal for the subject can also be interpreted two ways. His relentless attacks on LA, to the point of self-destruction (thinking of his business interests in particular), make me suspicious. I can see how it would be galling to be a clean guy overshadowed by a doper, but it's hard not to see his approach as ultimately self-serving. And what is a doper's mentality if not supremely self-serving?
Digger said:Evidence that lemond doped?
Umm, he was top of the sport when the pro peleton was 99.9% dirty. So, either he was naturally better than not just the whole rest of the peleton, but the whole rest of the peleton on dope, or he was a doper. That's very unfair logic, I know, but there it is.
Obviously, Greg's zeal for the subject can also be interpreted two ways. His relentless attacks on LA, to the point of self-destruction (thinking of his business interests in particular), make me suspicious. I can see how it would be galling to be a clean guy overshadowed by a doper, but it's hard not to see his approach as ultimately self-serving. And what is a doper's mentality if not supremely self-serving?