Dear Wiggo said:
Sorry to take it off topic and not talk about Greg Lemond, but a couple of thoughts.
1. What a load of utter crap!
Not totally true.
Dear Wiggo said:
2. Altitude training (Hgb) effects last around the same time as the training conducted (?). So a 3 week training camp, followed by the traditional 2 week pre-Tour taper, then week 1 & 2 at the tour (ie 4 weeks), means you have diddly squat enhancement available, not to mention the plasma expansion slapping you around. Compare this physiologically depressed state with someone getting a bag on or just before the second rest day (as evidenced in LAs, Wiggins x 2 and Ryder), or continual EPO micro-dosing for the 3 weeks. No comparison.
Ferrari should have said "hypoxic exposure" rather than "altitude training." Using a hypoxic chamber, simulated altitude exposure could be maintained until the Tour began. Side note - plasma volume expansion actually increases performance when done to a proper level.
Dear Wiggo said:
3. How can Ferrari claim a similar effect given LA doped AND did altitude training?
He provided a theoretical comparison to EPO micro-dosing, which, assuming that Armstrong is a responder to hypoxic exposure, is reasonable. However, hypoxic exposure cannot match the effect of higher EPO doses. In addition, as I mentioned, hypoxic exposure does not provide uniform results: it works very well for some, OK for others, and some are non-responders.
My guess is Armstrong was merely using hypoxic exposure to mask EPO use, even as a complete Red Herring.
Dear Wiggo said:
4. How ironically helpful for Wiggins' claim of clean Tour + 2012 domination based purely on altitude training effects. This claim by Ferrari if anything made me think of Hog's oft repeated assertions. Given LA had already confessed, why on earth would Ferrari come out and say this? He's banned from training anyone. It makes very little sense to me.
There is more than one way to skin a cat. In addition, where Ferrari is spot-on is that 10%+10%+10% does not equal 30% -- there is a limit to performance enhancement from doping.
Are there any gray-area or currently legal methods, that when combined with others, could still offer significant performance enhancement? Yes, given:
1) The individual is a responder;
2) His "trainers" really, really know what they are doing...