- Mar 18, 2009
- 2,553
- 0
- 0
lean said:your ethics seem to be selective. it's unethical to share the data w/o permission, a point on which i agree. however, if you're going to discredit grappe in a public forum such as this you would need said data to do so otherwise it would be unethical. to go a step further, if you don't have permission to speak freely about the data then you shouldn't really be speaking publicly about having access to the data at all. in this case we're supposed to just believe one of two oracles, grappe who won't talk specifics or andy coggan who won't discuss specifics. both of your contributions to this discussion are, well....worthless.![]()
You seem to be reading far more into my post than you should. My point was simply that objective data support the conclusion that Contador performed quite credibly at the Dauphine, even if he did not win. I do not see how this "discredits" Grappe - all it does is place his 10% estimate in better context (i.e., if Contador really did improve significantly between the two races, it was not up from some markedly sub-par level).