- Mar 31, 2010
- 18,136
- 5
- 0
Netserk said::facepalm:
So Contador was equally strong as Valverde on the first MTF?
no because valverde paced the entire climb
Netserk said::facepalm:
So Contador was equally strong as Valverde on the first MTF?
and Nairo only had his nose in the wind for less than 500m on Valdelinares....Ryo Hazuki said:no because valverde paced the entire climb
Miburo said:In the giro purito crashes out granting quintana a free win.
In the tour Contador and Froome crashes out granting nibali the right to ride at 50% and still crushing some random french riders.
In the vuelta now quintana gives up in the vuelta granting Contador a free win? Or am i speaking too early.
I'm a contador fan but winning this way ain't the same, unlike some nibali fans i can admit that![]()
King Boonen said:Just bitter because Contador can only win the worst GT.
Helvellyn said:Nah, the Vuelta is definitely better than the Tour of California![]()
Cance > TheRest said:So Nibali rides more careless on cobbles than AC, is your point?![]()
My point is that Netserk's point is pointlessCance > TheRest said:So Nibali rides more careless on cobbles than AC, is your point?![]()
4. How much stronger would Contador have been in the Vuelta if he had completed (won) the Tour without any crashes?Pantani_lives said:So we can start the hypothetical questions again.
1. What if Quintana hadn't crashed of the of the Vuelta?
2. What if Nibali had crashed out of the Tour and was now in the Vuelta?
3. What if Betancur was twenty pounds lighter?
It was an answer, not a point.cineteq said:My point is that Netserk's point is pointless![]()