Hoe can they keep listing Baroncini as part of the break when he DNF'ed yesterday?
I don't get how hard such things can apparently be to get right...
"Baroncini"... "Brustenga"... same-same...
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Hoe can they keep listing Baroncini as part of the break when he DNF'ed yesterday?
I don't get how hard such things can apparently be to get right...
"Baroncini"... "Brustenga"... same-same...
It's even the race with the most visible bib numbers I have ever seen, so that can't be used as an excuse.
Some people just aren't strong with numbers...
I actually liked the parcours when announced as it was good to see the race do something different, happy to see it worked out for the race.The best TDU for quite some time. I was dubious when the parcours was announced, but it really worked out.
The best TDU for quite some time. I was dubious when the parcours was announced, but it really worked out.
The stage needed one more lap - The prologue was the deciding factor and it's a pity it rained - Overall a good parcours which was raced aggressively by the peleton.
Promising performance by Tiberi throughout the week, his best ever in a WT race.
There were 12 seconds between Vine and Yates in the prologue, and 11 in the end: there was no other stage when there was time between them. It was very much decisive.The prologue definitely helped open-up the race and had a positive outcome on the race dynamics, it was a great addition in my view. I think saying it was the decisive factor might be misleading.