Mambo95 said:I'd bet $10,000, mainly because for $100,000 I can get a better, very low risk return on my investment from the banks.
That depends how quick the bet pays off...
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Mambo95 said:I'd bet $10,000, mainly because for $100,000 I can get a better, very low risk return on my investment from the banks.
BroDeal said:To make that bet I would take all of the cash and securities that I have, sell everything that I own down to one pair jockey shorts and a pair of sandals, borrow as much as I could, pimp my girlfriend, and spend every free moment pan handling for a few dollars more, so I could put it all on the "Armstrong doped" side of the table.
Benotti69 said:speaking of money to bet he is guilty, lots, all of Bernie Madoff's
alos i bet he starts a 'fight the lies' campaign to pay his lawyers for all this
Barrus said:I would choose number 1. Firstly the EPO, secondly the backdated TUE both are already proof that he used doping,k and that is technical proof, not even taking into account eye witness testimony. Perhaps it cannot be proven in the Novitsky trial (if it even comes up there), but really there is a lot of evidence already
FoxxyBrown1111 said:To top you all: I´d bet my life (that Armstrong doped).
BotanyBay said:Would you bet it in an Iranian court room?
scribe said:No way he didn't use hotsauce.
I'd wager my virgin ***.
Cloxxki said:Would there be one fanboy left with an IQ over 100, betting as much as their next meal on Lance to be clean?
Hugh Januss said:Uhm, I think the question here is "would you put up something of actual value?"
epo1999 said:I would bet a testicle.
la.margna said:So would I. 1 ball + $1m top up.
not the slightest doubt. but of course, whether it can be provend or he gets convicted, that's written on another paper... only God knows. and that's really only important. it's not up to us to judge.
Merckx index said:A confession by LA would serve as proof that he doped. So possibly would certain tests on old samples. I'm not sure at this point what would constitute proof that he didn't, but let's suppose that some such proof could emerge.
don't push it.rhubroma said:I'd put my girlfriend up for grabs before a prison of rapists.
Merckx index said:I'm assuming, of course, that there is some way the truth, one way or the other, comes out in a fashion that makes it undeniably the truth. A confession by LA would serve as proof that he doped. So possibly would certain tests on old samples.
wildeone said:don't push it.
there are some females (me) on the forum.