I wasn't going to give it an exact figure rating, but let's just say it has not gone well. We'll leave it at that. Like many, I found the route very underwhelming to begin with. Which doesn't mean the Tour itself has to be overwhelming, but we need things to happen to overcome the lackluster route. Unfortunately, virtually every major event that has happened went the other way. The rain on the first day seemed to do no more than serve as an excuse to neuter the stage and cause injuries. It seemed several top candidates went conservative (most notably Porte) and the end result was Chris Froome gaining at least a half minute on all major contenders. On a Tour designed to have such few stages to gain time, this was a huge blow towards a competitive yellow jersey. Not good if you were rooting for some drama in the GC or at least not a runaway. And we lost Alejando Valverde, one of the sport's most exciting riders, to injury. On the one "contenders" stage, we also saw Contador and Quintana lose time. Neither are exactly shocks. But I know some hoped that Contador had one last great ride in him or that Quintana could somehow be competitive for the overall win despite riding the Giro and having a route that really didn't suit him. Neither happened, which just further harms the chance of anyone threatening Froome.
The sprints have been dominated by Kittel. He won 3 and only lost the other one because he got held up in the crash. I suppose you could look at it as a positive or a negative. Some like to see domination. Others like to see variety. Personally, I prefer the latter, even though I respect the former.
And finally, I have not touched the huge news of week one. Which was the DQ of Peter Sagan. No matter what your opinion is on the matter, The Tour is without one of it's best riders. And this time is was by choice of UCI, not by a fall. The overwhelming opinion by those involved in the sport seems to be that the punishment is not proportional to the "crime" and on the whole the decision to disqualify him seems deeply flawed. In the end, it just seems to hurt the sport.
I'm stealing someone else's post on this, but it was said:
Froome is going to win yellow. Who cares about the Green it's tainted and undeserved no matter who wins it. White nobody ever really cares and the polka dot only Cannondale cares about and they won't get it anyway.
Which is super pessimistic, but probably true for the most part. Only a competitive GC will likely save this Tour from being extremely disappointing