Tattoos? Ever seen Hollentour?krebs303 said:How do they hide the injection sites? intravenous injection sites leave tracks on me for a week. or do they inject between their toes like heroin users?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Tattoos? Ever seen Hollentour?krebs303 said:How do they hide the injection sites? intravenous injection sites leave tracks on me for a week. or do they inject between their toes like heroin users?
krebs303 said:How do they hide the injection sites? intravenous injection sites leave tracks on me for a week. or do they inject between their toes like heroin users?
Thanks for the information.analo69 said:In the good old days CSC introduced their own bio passport, with a Danish doctor responsible.
As far as I can recall this program is now overwith because the UCI introduced a very similar program.
Here are som data from the CSC bio passport program. As I understand these data are almost idenitcal to the data from the UCI bio passport.
So you ca see for yourself what the bio passport is all about.
http://www.riis-cycling.com/pdf/CSC_Saxo_Bank_second_AD_report.pdf
Note that no riders have a baseline 48-49% heamotocrit, but more like the normal 42-44%.
Escarabajo said:Thanks for the information.
I don't know about you but I still see some kind of trend. Most Hemat.% seems to be higher in the months of december, january and february. Maybe when they are jacking up and drawing some blood for later. Of course we never going to see the values of the drak ages when most everybody was over 50%.
That's just me thinking.
Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback.hmronnow said:Hematocrit percentage generally falls with increased fitness. So it is normal to be slightly higher in the months with less intensive training.
davidg said:Excellent informative post. What I am not clear on is, if you blood dope before the race to raise crit to >50% wont that show in a test if you cannot dilute before the control?
Escarabajo said:Thanks for the information.
I don't know about you but I still see some kind of trend. Most Hemat.% seems to be higher in the months of december, january and february. Maybe when they are jacking up and drawing some blood for later. Of course we never going to see the values of the dark ages when most everybody was over 50%.
That's just me thinking.
Thanks.
BigBoat said:They dont actually need a high crit to donate blood...
The Plasma gets spun off in a centrifuge so they can blood dope with pure red cells that have been stored in say glyceral solution + additives like saline, adenine, glucose, mannitol, sodium bicarbonate, and disodium phosphate in a chilly fridge at 1-6 degrees C. This will last 41 day shelf life in 350 ml blood bags..
The volume with pure red cells is less for a transfusion. A single unit of Pure red cells will raise crit by 3-4%... A big 600cc transfusion could give an 8% increase!
Or they can use cryopreservation which glyceralizes the red cells for a shelf life of up to 10 bloody years at -80 C / half as cold as the boiling point of liquid Nitrogen! This allows the riders to store up blood for the future so they dont have to have draw off periods anymore.
The red blood cells need to be diluted and thawed properly before transfusion or there are major health concerns.
Cheers again.
franciep10 said:how do you know this stuff I mean cryropreservation come on drop some knowledge on me
BigBoat said:The shelf life in some circumstances (in one trial study that started in teh 1970s.. was able to store some RBCs for up to ~ 37 years.
Crazy huh!
Alpe d'Huez said:The test for HGH is either still in trials, or unreliable, or only works for something like 1 day.
As I said before, it's money, and the culture of doping - teams, trainers, doctors, and especially riders and sponsors - that are the real key to getting doping to stop.
This has long been the assumption, that behind the tinted windows of the team bus you have several riders being hooked up to blood infusions. So one small way would be to take the riders into the "race village" when they sign on before the start and then to hold them there whilst selecting a few to measure their haematocrit count. Simple and cheap, it only means changing the timing of the near-pointless UCI "vampire" tests where riders are woken early to provide blood samples for the same purpose but idiotically given hours to refill.BigBoat said:You see what Kohl said, less that 20 minutes per refill (about 650 cc each).
Wattt did I say! They can now do this right before the start of the key stages... And take blood out immediately after.
issoisso said:In fact, they specifically said the names will be announced on Monday, right after they contact the riders themselves.
rolfrae said:The UCI said it would be solely the responsibility of teams to impose suspensions against the riders. "There will not be provisionally suspended by the UCI, has stressed Pat McQuaid . This will be the teams to make a decision. "awaited for several months, the first list of names of riders with abnormal blood data could be unveiled Monday, according to sources within the UCI.[/I]
elapid said:Also like the timing. Why do things like this (Festina, Operation Puerto, Vienna, now the Biological Passport) always get revealed just before a GT, and usually the TdF? It stinks of something more complicit. Maybe I'm just getting too cynical in my old age.
rolfrae said:It's maximum publicity for the facade that they are actively fighting doping.
Mellow Velo said:Yes. Shove the ball into the team's court.
Hope they will save the UCI a fortune in lawyer's bills, just to find out they haven't a leg to stand on.
I expect the names to be leaking from HQ, before the weekend.
Bet there won't be a single rider who's on one of those nice "medical programmes".........
.........unless someone is passing on an extra large brown envelope, to get rid of a certain Spaniard.