- Jul 8, 2017
- 2,420
- 3,103
- 17,180
This is such a strange and nonsensical perspective to take in the '3rd best GT rider' discussion. I don't think anybody who is arguing Lipowitz' case puts any emphasis on who he beat. That is quite irrelevant. The thing worth looking at is how relatively close he was to the aliens in terms of climbing. There's clearly a case to be made for having him in this discussion. There is of course the sample size issue, but if we had more data points, this wouldn't be such a discussion in the first place.
I don't think he was that "relatively close". He lost 4.30 in the only 2 stages they went 100%.
Afterwards, not being able to drop each other, they naturally want slower. Had one of them been able to drop the other, thus go 100%, the gap would've probably been 15 minutes (and they would have won maybe 3 more stages, but that's irrelevant). And I don't think 15 minutes is close, or even "relatively close".
Obviously it doesn't come to say that Lipowitz was weak, just that the gap is bigger than what the numbers say. Could someone else get between the aliens and Lipo, obviously I don't know, but I'm inclined to believe so.
