hrotha said:
Your interpretation is a stretch. I took that simply to mean "no one strikes me as an obvious doper; they may be doping but no one appears to be supercharging or anything", i.e. they seem to be cleaner than other teams.
fair point
Netserk said:
Instead of an Italian or American team??? If you had to pick one team you think is the least dirty one, which is it?
with my degree of knowledge of present day cycling (marginal compared to most posters here) i surely shouldn't make any claims as to who i think is cleanest.
It's a difficult question, as i do think some of the low ranked teams contain some obvious chargers (kittel being a nice case in point, voeckler another).
for what it's worth, in the netherlands juicing seems to be ignored on many levels and to a considerable extent appears to be institutionally supported as the case of adrienne herzog for instance shows.
Note also that e.g. boogerd is still immensely popular.
We've been finding out how Dutch cylcing has been at the heart of many doping scandals, and many of the riders who've been key figures in those scandals continue to play a role in (Dutch) cycling. \
Belkin's existential problems and their move to Girona combined with their good results in last years tdf all doesn't bode well for Belkin being clean. I have no reason to assume Argos are clean either.