Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Billie said:Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Because Cavendish doesn't get dropped on every obstacle harder than a roundabout
robin440 said:Billie said:Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Because Cavendish doesn't get dropped on every obstacle harder than a roundabout
Dubai 2014 stage 4 had a few obstacles in it that were harder than a roundabout!
Billie said:Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Because Cavendish doesn't get dropped on every obstacle harder than a roundabout
DFA123 said:Billie said:Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Because Cavendish doesn't get dropped on every obstacle harder than a roundabout
I don't think Etixx will care about that at all. They've got more than enough puncheurs who are fast finishers on lumpy terrain and uphill finish. What they need is someone to consistently win dead flat stages - which usually make up about a quarter of TdF stages. Cavendish wasn't cutting it, and for a team with no GC rider, they really need to be challenging on as many individual stages as possible - especially when they are as big as Etixx.
too much of a risk IMO. No winning is still ok as improvements can be made but he is not even finishing races. Don't know what the problem is . Could be mononucleosis. Maybe a year or 2 to recover. Andy Schleck had similar problems and he had to retire. Cunego is another.Zinoviev Letter said:DFA123 said:Billie said:Bavarianrider said:Jspear said:The CN article doesn't say....anyone know how much cheaper he was than Cav?
Why the hell should a way younger, way faster, way better looking and way more charismatic guy be cheaper than Cavendish![]()
![]()
![]()
Because Cavendish doesn't get dropped on every obstacle harder than a roundabout
I don't think Etixx will care about that at all. They've got more than enough puncheurs who are fast finishers on lumpy terrain and uphill finish. What they need is someone to consistently win dead flat stages - which usually make up about a quarter of TdF stages. Cavendish wasn't cutting it, and for a team with no GC rider, they really need to be challenging on as many individual stages as possible - especially when they are as big as Etixx.
You don't have to make any negative assumptions about either rider to explain the switch, Etixx apparently have a somewhat reduced budget. Kittel had a terrible year and then fell out with his team. Therefore Kittel is available at below his expected value. Cavendish only got one Tour stage, but he also got 14 wins, so while he might well be starting the downward slope of his career, he's not going to take a very large pay cut. Therefore Kittel makes sense, regardless of which rider you'd prefer to have monetary issues aside.
Kittel is a bit of a risk, given that it's not entirely clear what's been wrong with him. But he's young, he's super-fast and is a risk worth taking.
yaco said:Wow. The best sprinter has 5 pages in this forum.
This^...He is just flat out fast, what else is there to say? Even though its nearly a foregone conclusion that he will win if he is in the mix at 500 M, its still fun to watch him rip his bike to pieces. I wonder if he gets new bikes more often just to be safe? His team seems to really like the guy. When they congratulate him their smiles are huge and the hugs are real. Who else compares WT/TdF sprints to tetris?!deValtos said:yaco said:Wow. The best sprinter has 5 pages in this forum.
He's too fast for his own good. There's literally nothing to discuss. :lol:
He doesn't even make contentious/dangerous moves to dispute.
He just wins.
Maybe he needs to post more coffee-drinking pictures on Instagramyaco said:Wow. The best sprinter has 5 pages in this forum.
I honestly feel that those guys would love little more than to see that happen.Valv.Piti said:I hope he will win 8 stages for pure comedy. I hope that will make Gouvenou and Prudhomme realise how miserably of a job they've done! To be fair to Kittel tho, he clearly is at some monster shape, he isn't as one dimensional either as some make him out to be.