Thoughtforfood said:And flagging it for offense was a tough decision. But I ask you this, if a forum is to be open, should it entertain posts that demeans its members in a finite manner, or should the debate be done to engender thoughtful self appraisal? Because, contrary to your portrayal, it was not a post that was meant to open debate or make point of pragmatic common sense. It was meant to be offensive.
I understand your protestation. Maybe I was wrong. Maybe I should have looked at the picture and moved on never to view it again. If I made a mistake, it was a mistake of sincere pain in seeing the center of a belief system that took a gun out of my mouth and gave me a reason to hope that the next morning was worth waking up for degraded in a way that seemed meant only do belittle. Maybe I need thicker skin sometimes. I have been told that. Do I believe Jesus was all that concerned, no I don't. I don't cater to the petulant child version of God promoted by Christianity.
If I offended you by objecting then I apologize. It was a reflexive reaction. If you have never had one, then you are a lucky man indeed.
gregod said:i get what you are saying. well said.
one thing, sometimes the openness of a dialog depends on pushing boundaries in order to learn something new.
Thoughtforfood said:I don't make fun of atheism because there is no object to ridicule. You guys are comedic Teflon.
Rip:30 said:
Thoughtforfood said:Maybe we aren't as much the center of his existence as we think? If I were him, I would like whales better.
gregod said:anything (or in this case nothing) is capable of being made fun of. you just have to know how. some of the funniest people about atheism are atheists themselves.
Rip:30 said:Absolutely. What will he think we soon create synthetic life?
krebs303 said:This the kind of stuff made you think I'm not a God fearing man.
I just think it is quite clever.
TFF ever get into Apologetics (the discipline of defending a position (often religious) through the systematic use of reason). I took a couple of classes and found it fascinating. I think you would enjoy it![]()
ElChingon said:This is the Free form/Chaos Thread, don't like Free form/Chaos, then go to another thread. Pretty simple concept.
I stay out of threads that are boring and basically empty so if you consider this thread such then ...
Or has Free form/Chaos's meaning been re-defined?
Some members need a reality check, its not a Forum for just one person's opinion views.
This place is getting ridiculous.
krebs303 said:Ernest Digweed Leaves Money to the Lord
Digweed, who we assume was either extremely devout or just a few apples short of a pie, left $47,000 to Jesus back in the late '70s. Jesus had 100 years to show up (80 now, clocks ticking Of Nazareth) and claim the money or it all goes to the state. Instructions were given for the money to be invested in government bonds, meaning that if the Lord shows up at the agreed upon drop time, he'll be able to claim over $600,000.
Predictably, problems have arisen as more than one Jesus has shown up to claim the prize, which we suppose is good news because it looks like there's at least twice as much savior walking around as we thought. Though it appears they're all strapped for cash
Thoughtforfood said:The only one I have is about agnosticism: What is an agnostic, insomniac, dyslexic? A person who lays awake at night wondering if there is a dog.
Rip:30 said:
