Re: Re:
A theory that explains everything explains nothing.
It guess its possible that 99% dope but there is very little to back that up.
The evidence DEFINATELY is there that the elite dope, that everyone who wins gts dopes, that everyone who competes for gts dope. There might even be strong evidence to say that many of the domestiques dope as well.
But to go from that to - 100% dope, is a bit of a stretch, especially since you aren't really making any arguments for it. You are just saying - everyone dopes, therefore
everyone dopes, argument over.
And you randomly throw that logic into several different threads.
Imo your argument is no different from those who say the sport is clean. Both of you use conveniently simple arguments to reach absolute conclusions.
Neither of you understand the simple fact that life is far more complicated than that.
Benotti69 said:The Hitch said:Benotti69 said:maltiv said:Notorius dopers like Debuscchere, Greipel and Theuns.Benotti69 said:A clean Kristoff can win 3 in a row against dopers?
Wake up! FFS!!!!
The whole peloton dopes, duh!
Since when did everyone decide that no more doping. Must have missed that huge change in the sport!!!
Merely saying - everyone must dope therefore everyone dopes is a silly argument. It's one thing to argue that sport is dirty but to simply put down everyone with this flawed formula, helps no one.
What do you think it adds to the discussion to simply repeat as fact that 100% of cyclists are doping?
I call it a reality check, Hitch old sport.
Can you point to an athlete who is happy to be riding amongst the flotsam and jetsam of doping while they struggle along on bread and water?
A theory that explains everything explains nothing.
It guess its possible that 99% dope but there is very little to back that up.
The evidence DEFINATELY is there that the elite dope, that everyone who wins gts dopes, that everyone who competes for gts dope. There might even be strong evidence to say that many of the domestiques dope as well.
But to go from that to - 100% dope, is a bit of a stretch, especially since you aren't really making any arguments for it. You are just saying - everyone dopes, therefore
everyone dopes, argument over.
And you randomly throw that logic into several different threads.
Imo your argument is no different from those who say the sport is clean. Both of you use conveniently simple arguments to reach absolute conclusions.
Neither of you understand the simple fact that life is far more complicated than that.