Lance Indictment Watch - How Many Counts?

[Race Radio]

How about a month and year? Issue number? Who's on the cover?

I'm just trying to help you help yourself...

Google makes it pretty easy.

Nowhere in the Playboy article is there any mention of a judge telling Novtizky to stop talking. None of the other investigators confirmed any of White's claims, in fact quite the opposite.

If you read something negative about Novizky the source is always the same, Littman.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

How about a month and year? Issue number? Who's on the cover?

I'm just trying to help you help yourself...

Well this is a link to a Playboy article in 2008.

The one JRTinMA is on about was from March 2004 - but i have yet to find a link for it.

 

[JRTinMA]

...and you read what I wrote for Scribe.

You are intentionally being misleading I hope. He said she has been TALKING! Obviously the deal part is an opinion.

 

[JRTinMA]

Well this is a link to a playboy article in 2007 (i think)http://www.playboy.com/articles/barry-bonds/

The one JRTinMA is on about was from March 2004 - but i have yet to find a link for it.

I never said a word about 2004, somebody else did. Get the facts straight. EDIT, in fact it was you. I give

 

[python]

I'm not posting a link to playboy, its against the rules. You have been exposed as an angry little dude though. The big difference is I have a life, I don't need to impress anybody on a forum. If that was the case I would join up with your crew. I think independently, something you fear because you may be rejected, you're weak and calling me a fanboy proves it. Just like you sucking up to the mods all the time, this is just you sucking up to to RR and Dr. M. You practical scream "somebody notice me". I'm done with you now.

you are again dodging and propogating your own lies. no ad hominems or assurances that 'you have a life' are needed. the little angry man is the one whos'e knees jerk when the object of his fanboyism is mentioned in two threads, you lost credibility the moment you tried to falsify your allegiance by trying to impress 'haters'. the little man is the one who can't stand up and admit he's a fanboy.

keep attacking the messenger when it really was very simple, you were asked to produced a link you promised. no mod will have it redacted if it's factual and to the point of your accusations.

you hiding behind a potential for being moderated is a transparent falsehood and the evidence that you are a little sorrow man who bags others to address him properly.

is lying, baiting conniving fan boy proper ?

 

[Dr. Maserati]

You are intentionally being misleading I hope. He said she has been TALKING! Obviously the deal part is an opinion.

Yeeeessss....... and I have already given you my reason for agreeing with him. Would you like me to write it again?

 

[JRTinMA]

you are again dodging and propogating your own lies. no ad hominems or assurances that 'you have a life' are needed. the little angry man is the one whos'e knees jerk when the object of his fanboyism is mentioned in two threads, you lost credibility the moment you tried to falsify your allegiance by trying to impress 'haters'. the little man is the one who can't stand up and admit he's a fanboy.

keep attacking the messenger when it really was very simple, you were asked to produced a link you promised. no mod will have it redacted if it's factual and to the point of your accusations.

you hiding behind a potential for being moderated is a transparent falsehood and the evidence that you are little sorrow man who bags other to address him properly.

is lying, baiting conniving fan boy proper ?

I admitted it just a couple of posts ago. Just to make you happy. When you coming out?

 

[Race Radio]

Its linked within this article. But it was pointed out that this guy is a bonds fanboy so he can't be believed.

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/02/marin_writer_tosses_high_hard.php

Where is the part about the judge telling him to shut up?

 

[python]

When you coming out?

you've invited my response by inveting crap about me, i promised to challenge you...so i'll stay as long as you continue to dodge simple requests and propagate falsehoods.

 

[JMBeaushrimp]

Where is the part about the judge telling him to shut up?

I missed that content, too...

 

[buckwheat]

Why do you ask Polish? Worried your retainer with Public Strategies will not be renewed?

I thought you had created this thread.

I know you have a crystal ball in these matters.

I'm saying one charge. Violation of RICO statutes.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

I never said a word about 2004, somebody else did. Get the facts straight. EDIT, in fact it was you. I give

Oh, well i was giving you the benefit of the doubt as the 2008 article does not say anything like you have suggested so i assumed it must be from the earlier article.
I forgot you already admitted you were trolling...my bad.

 

[JRTinMA]

Where is the part about the judge telling him to shut up?

Maybe it wasn't the judge, I had that wrong. Then again neither you nor I know that to be fact. He definitely tipped off the media to parts of the case. I'm not reading it again but its in there someplace, I'll take your word there is nothing about the judge.

Would this be a bad time to ask for that link on KA talking?

 

[scribe]

Read what I wrote, scribe - "after that it is just his opinion" which relates to RR saying "Armstrong will be begging for a deal".

No one cares about his opinion, aside from a handful of people he shares a brain with. That's not what anyone other than yourself is talking about in this thread.

 

[JRTinMA]

Oh, well i was giving you the benefit of the doubt as the 2008 article does not say anything like you have suggested so i assumed it must be from the earlier article.
I forgot you already admitted you were trolling...my bad.

Wrong again, RR was trolling with his KA comment. He even answered with a wait and see comment, further attempting to substantiate his BS.

 

[Polish]

I'm saying one charge. Violation of RICO statutes.

If there is one charge - RICO - you get bigtime Clinic bragging rights.
Maybe JV will supply the necessary info to seal the charge

And Scribe predicted Perjury charges....

Ok, now we are getting somewhere

 

[Dr. Maserati]

Wrong again, RR was trolling with his KA comment. He even answered with a wait and see comment, further attempting to substantiate his BS.

Wrong again - your view has already been shown to be BS - we have to wait and see if RR's is, but like I said earlier I expect her to comply to avoid jailtime.

 

[JRTinMA]

Wrong again - your view has already been shown to be BS - we have to wait and see if RR's is, but like I said earlier I expect her to comply to avoid jailtime.

Based on your dumb logic I should have stayed with my cop out I stole from RR, the ol' "just wait and see comment" and claimed insider knowledge. I should have said I am a secretary in the court system and I have inside knowledge that he was reprimanded. Do you now see where your logic is flawed? I doubt you will because that would require you to think independently and without bias. Give it a go.

 

[BullsFan22]

I have no idea how many counts, perhaps 7! But I am hoping we don't go over 7 pages with this, just so it stays ironically on 7, with hopefully 7 counts. The 7 deadly sins! Kevin Spacey, beware. I want a copyright on that.

 

[Polish]

Wrong again - your view has already been shown to be BS - we have to wait and see if RR's is, but like I said earlier I expect her to comply to avoid jailtime.

But c'mon, what about Lance?

What kind of charges will come from KS's testimony to the Grand jury?
Lets get back on topic please.

I suspect it is the haters that whine the most to the Mods...
"WaaWaa, he's a troll"
"WaaWaa, he said the word "pervert""
"WaaWaa, he misquoted wiki"
"WaaWaa, they are going off topic"

I suspect the FanBoys do not whine nearly as much.
However, I am going to break ranks and report RR/Python/DrM for some of their comments in this thread. GRRRRRR.


HaHaHa, just kidding. C'mon, fanboys can't whine lol.

 

[buckwheat]

Based on your dumb logic I should have stayed with my cop out I stole from RR, the ol' "just wait and see comment" and claimed insider knowledge. I should have said I am a secretary in the court system and I have inside knowledge that he was reprimanded. Do you now see where your logic is flawed? I doubt you will because that would require you to think independently and without bias. Give it a go.

Heads up to you.

RR does in fact have a crystal ball. That's code. He gets advance word on such matters.

One of the few insiders on these forums.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

Based on your dumb logic I should have stayed with my cop out I stole from RR, the ol' "just wait and see comment" and claimed insider knowledge. I should have said I am a secretary in the court system and I have inside knowledge that he was reprimanded. Do you now see where your logic is flawed? I doubt you will because that would require you to think independently and without bias. Give it a go.

You're right you should have - instead you embellished the Playboy article and got caught out.

 

[JRTinMA]

You're right you should have - instead you embellished the Playboy article and got caught out.

I see you couldn't do it, very telling. I didn't embellish anything, i made a reference to an article I read two years ago and I admitted I was wrong based on RR reading. Big difference than just making something up and then trying to substantiate it with a wait and see.

To Polish, he will cut a deal and walk. So the counts will be zero. Or maybe they will find him guilty of laundering 100 bucks like they did Conte.

 

[scribe]

If there is one charge - RICO - you get bigtime Clinic bragging rights.
Maybe JV will supply the necessary info to seal the charge

And Scribe predicted Perjury charges....

Ok, now we are getting somewhere

cuff 'im and stuff 'im. coo' coo' coo'

 

[scribe]

I see you couldn't do it, very telling. I didn't embellish anything, i made a reference to an article I read two years ago and I admitted I was wrong based on RR reading. Big difference than just making something up and then trying to substantiate it with a wait and see.

To Polish, he will cut a deal and walk. So the counts will be zero. Or maybe they will find him guilty of laundering 100 bucks like they did Conte.

I've accidentally laundered $20. But never sent a big buck through there.