Race Radio said:Ha.
FYI, I uploaded those docs less then 30 minutes ago......they have already been viewed by 500 people
Good work!
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Race Radio said:Ha.
FYI, I uploaded those docs less then 30 minutes ago......they have already been viewed by 500 people
Scott SoCal said:Yes. Not only have they not blinked, LA's remaining knad is in Tygarts vise and Travis keeps turning it tighter and tighter.
This is no longer death by 1000 cuts.
I can't imagine how uncomfortable LA is nowadays.
Turner29 said:Keep in mind Lance Armstrong is a sociopath. As such, he does not feel discomfort. In his mind, he "passed" every doping test. That is all that matters in his mind -- using EPO is not doping, as long as a some threshold limit is not crossed. If the Hct limit is 50%, 49.99 is fine, not matter what was done to attain such.
He feels no embarrassment, no guilt. Just anger.
Scott SoCal said:Perhaps. He's also smart enough to know he's in a world of ****... and he is acting and making mistakes accordingly.
He's smart enough to know his world as he knows it is going down the toilet and there's nothing he can now to to clog it.
He knows.
Race Radio said:Ha.
FYI, I uploaded those docs less then 30 minutes ago......they have already been viewed by 500 people
Turner29 said:At least one Republican, John McCain, has taken a shot at him.
rhubroma said:Yes, though he's still working that angle.
Turner29 said:And a Democrat Representative against him. Unless he can pull out some serious cards one Senator and one Representative trumps (pun intended) one Representative.
rhubroma said:It's horrific though how the lobby system works in the country.
Turner29 said:They have legalized bribary.
TexPat said:Are lawyers allowed to lie during a deposition?
For example, if opposing counsel said to a witness during a sworn deposition that "no endurance athlete would use anabolic steroids" knowing full well that the statement is an outright falsehood, is it allowed?
Thanks
TexPat said:Are lawyers allowed to lie during a deposition?
For example, if opposing counsel said to a witness during a sworn deposition that "no endurance athlete would use anabolic steroids" knowing full well that the statement is an outright falsehood, is it allowed?
Thanks
Cerberus said:I'm not a lawyer, but they're definitely not allowed to lie. The trick is proving it's a lie, even if you prove it's false that doesn't prove they didn't believe it?
I will now leave the scene to someone who might actually know something about the issue that they didn't learn from a TV-series.
TexPat said:Are lawyers allowed to lie during a deposition?
For example, if opposing counsel said to a witness during a sworn deposition that "no endurance athlete would use anabolic steroids" knowing full well that the statement is an outright falsehood, is it allowed?
Thanks
Race Radio said:
Jack (6 ch) said:Excuse me for butting in. I read that article too (just come back from the US) and it caused me concern that Armstrong is seeking the injunction on jurisdiction in Texas (home ground potentially advantageous to him). Am I right to be concerned?