added dave's ##11 and 12 and #13 from myself. Robert21, i think you are correct, but we should focus on the uci special treatment of armstrong and his teams ONLY as that's what being the substance of 2 lawsuits.
1. Contrary to overwhelming evidence, the president of the UCI stated in black and white, 'he never,never doped'. this is in public records*
2. contrary to uci statements, the lausanne lab director confirmed to usada, uci arranging secret meetings following armstrong's tds epo 'suspicious'. this is in public records
3. contrary to uci statements, the uci did attempt to white wash armstrong's 6 epo positives with vrijman report. this is in public records.
4. contrary to uci statements, there are at least several other witnesses confirming floyd's story that armstrong bragged about his influence with the uci.
5. contrary to every other known incidence, armstrong remains the only rider paying uci.**
6. contrary to other known examples, armstrong - a confirmed doping cyclist - used his influence with the uci to rat on the riders about their doping ('the spaniards on new shyt', 'tyler not normal')
7. UCI granting armstrong the license up on 2nd coming BEFORE the required 6 months of dope testing expired
8. the back dated corticosteroid prescription approved by the uci following a positive test
9. Repeated attempts to interfere in federal courts into USADA case against armstrong doping
10. UCI's persistent refusal to submit to usada some data regarding suspicious armstrong doping tests. this is in usada letters to uci and is part of the federal court proceedings.
11. UCI Chaperones providing advance notice of OOC ('surprise') tests, with notable preference to Lance/team
12. No fine/reprimand/punishment/consequence for threatening other riders (e.g. Filippo Simeoni)
13. Relentless suppression, litigation and dismissal of anyone questioning uci's lack of transparency wrt to special treatment of armstrong. examples: firing of sylvia schenk over questioning armstrong's payments, suing wada's dijk pound over his criticism of uci covering up 1999 epo positives
we need more and we need this spread all over the media and internet !